[GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discuss ID 145: GPCA endorsement for Governor
Christopher Carlson
chris at bestofbroadway.org
Fri Feb 16 16:57:10 PST 2018
Erik,
"CADEM has 8 million members and corporate media. GPCA has 100,000 and
social media."
According to Secretary of State, 91,631 as of January 2, 2018. 94,720 as of
February 10, 2017.
We have lost 3,000 party members in less than 1 year.
94,647 in Nov 16.
77,868 in May 16.
109,836 in Feb 15.
110,511 in Nov 14.
109,674 in May 14.
108,785 in Dec 13.
All of these statistics show growth/decline in the party since the last
gubernatorial election in 2014.
In 2014 that the Green Party of California tried the exact strategy you are
supporting now.
Feeling been robbed of a primary, a single candidate was endorsed for each
statewide office.
Comparing Jan 2018 to Dec 2013, we are seeing a loss of (108,785 - 91,631)
17,154 registered voters.
That amounts to a net loss of 15%.
If we continue forward with the same strategy we tried in the 2014
election, we stand to lose another 15%,
and by compare the May 2014 total to the May 2016 to say we could lose
another 29% of what we have today.
That would leave the Green Party sitting at an approximate registration of
67,250 going into May 2020.
We have tried this strategy before and it has failed to generate growth in
the party. In 2014 our single Green Governors Candidate Luis J. Rodriguez
received 66,872 total votes (Wikipedia) totaling 1.54%. If all registered
Greens had voted, Luis would have earned 2.5% of the vote. Meanwhile, over
in the controller race, Laura Wells snagged 231,352 votes, almost two for
every one registered Green. Where is Luis now? And why did he not receive
the votes of all 109,674 registered Greens at the time? Is a Green running
in a Controller race?
On to the 2010 Primary, that we were robbed of. Only 19% of registered
Greens (22,081) turned out to vote. Laura Wells went on to claim 129,231
votes, (1.2%) against the establishment parties in the General Election.
Laura received 15,400 votes above the 113,835 tally of registered Greens, a
1.2% voteshare. Rodriguez improved upon her voteshare by 22%.
If you believe that a single candidate can truly win a seat in the top two
Governor's primary, or the Secretary of State's, the Greens carried 1.54%
in 2014 under top-two, and 1.2% in 2010 with an official state primary. We
have no data suggesting one Green will fare better starting with fewer
registered voters.
The SF Berniecrats endorsed Delaine Eastin after Josh Jones approached them
for support.
Mad respect,
Chris Carlson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Erik <erikrydberg34 at gmail.com> wrote:
> CADEM has 8 million members and corporate media. GPCA has 100,000 and
> social media. Our primary process was taken from us by Top Two. We are not
> garaunteed a candidate in the General Election anymore. If we don’t create
> a system to choose the strongest candidate then we risk multiple green
> candidates splitting the vote and we could lose party status by not having
> any statewide candidates reach 2% of the vote.
>
> We also want to actually win a Top Two Primary so keeping the state party
> from endorsing and fundraising for statewide candidates is political
> suicide. Some long time Greens suggest that GPCA never raises funds for
> candidates. And we wonder why we have had zero statewide candidates in
> office ever.
>
> Time to stop continuing failed strategies and take electoral politics
> seriously. We are out numbered by capitalist parties and we have to focus
> our power is we want to actually break the two party system. This
> endorsement process is long overdue.
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:41 PM james clark <faygodrinkit at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> One major concern is that this process would take power out of the voters
>> hands to decide which candidate best represents their values. It seems to
>> much the DNC and their delegates picking who people get to vote for. Not to
>> mention at several candidates already have their names on the ballot.
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2018 11:14 AM, "Victoria Ashley" <victronix01 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Since the vote doesn't start until late March, that would give some time
>>> to send out a list of all the GP candidates on the Inform List.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:20 AM, John-Marc Chandonia <jmc at sfgreens.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:25:47PM -0800, james clark wrote:
>>>> > I feel it is not in the best interests of the party to follow through
>>>> with
>>>> > this ill timed endorsement process. If we were to perform such a
>>>> process it
>>>> > should have been done prior to candidates reaching their ballot access
>>>> > goals. To do so at this juncture will only create animosity and
>>>> division,
>>>> > and will not effect candidates placement on the ballot.
>>>>
>>>> Don't they have until March 9 to raise funds for the ballot? If
>>>> that's the case, we should know by the time the SGA votes who is in
>>>> and who is out. I agree that we should not make an endorsement before
>>>> then, because we haven't had any process for informing Greens about
>>>> all the Green candidates running.
>>>>
>>>> JMC
>>>> --
>>>> John-Marc Chandonia (jmc at sfgreens.org)
>>>> http://sfgreens.org/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> gpca-votes mailing list
>>>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>>>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> gpca-votes mailing list
>>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>>>
>>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>>
> --
>
> *Erik Rydberg *
>
> *Green Party of California(GPCA) Spokesperson*
>
>
> *erikrydberg34 at gmail.com <erikrydberg34 at gmail.com>530-781-2903
> <(530)%20781-2903>*
>
> cagreens.org
>
>
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/gpca-votes/attachments/20180216/f747a916/attachment.html>
More information about the gpca-votes
mailing list