[GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discuss ID 154: Bylaws Interpretation regarding GPCA Endorsements of candidates in statewide races in June 2018 Primary Election

Sun Feb 18 12:10:41 PST 2018

I agree.  Also, in my hasty reading of comments, I have not see discussion of what precedent for the future woould be setting, when conditions could be vastly different.  
Please, consider the probability of extreme dissension, not just now but in many scenarios in the future.  This is NOT about this election only! 
Gloria
> On Feb 17, 2018, at 10:44 AM, Ajay Rai <ajay_rai at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> We should have had a recommendation process before the signature gathering period.  It was suggested as an agenda item for GAs by several people but was rejected/ignored  Now all of a sudden this has become an urgent issue.
> 
> It is unfair to all the candidates who have worked  hard to gather signatures and did all the right things, to endorse one single candidate.  This could be a lesson learnt to make sure that the GA agenda has the endorsement process before the signature gathering period.
> 
> Ajay 
> From: gpca-votes <gpca-votes-bounces at sfgreens.org> on behalf of Eric Brooks <brookse32 at hotmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 5:40:51 PM
> To: GPCA Discussion List for SGA Votes
> Subject: Re: [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discuss ID 154: Bylaws Interpretation regarding GPCA Endorsements of candidates in statewide races in June 2018 Primary Election
>  
> The problem is that all Green voters once had that ability to choose between Greenates in the primary - but no longer have it - because of the Top  Two primary sy
> 
> So if we (the SGA) don’t choose candidates, the Green vote will be split between multiple Green candidates for the same office, thereby giving our top candidates a much lower percentage of the votes against the Dems and GOP.
> 
> If we don’t hold a primary for those races, and run only one candidate in each one, our results will be guaranteed to be smashed down into the single digit percentages.
> 
> Eric Brooks
>  
> From: gpca-votes [mailto:gpca-votes-bounces at sfgreens.org] On Behalf Of james clark
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 6:31 PM
> To: GPCA Discussion List for SGA Votes <gpca-votes at sfgreens.org>
> Subject: Re: [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discuss ID 154: Bylaws Interpretation regarding GPCA Endorsements of candidates in statewide races in June 2018 Primary Election
>  
> Should not all greens have a chance to vote on who we endorse as a candidate, not just theare SGA delegates? 
>  
> On Feb 15, 2018 12:43 PM, "GPCA Votes" <gpca.votes at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please send your discussion comments to gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>  
> Discussion has begun for the following GPCA SGA ranked choice vote
>  
> Ranked Choice Vote ID #154
> Ranked Choice Vote Bylaws Interpretation regarding GPCA Endorsements of candidates in statewide races in June 2018 Primary Election
> Ranked Choice Vote Administrators: Victoria Ashley, Brian Good, Laura Wells, Eric Brooks, Mike Goldbeck
> Discussion  02/12/2018 - 03/25/2018
> Voting  03/26/2018 - 04/01/2018
> Voting ends at Midnight Pacific Time
>  
> Background
>  
> Since the implementation of the Top Two primary system in California in 2012, political party primaries have been eliminated. In response, the GPCA has begun to make endorsements for Greens running in statewide races. The endorsements
>  
> The Coordinating Committee on its February 5th, 2018, teleconference approved the following statement of findings / bylaws interpretation for the Standing General Assembly to determine endorsements of Green candidates in statewide races
>  
> Proposal
>  
> That the Standing General Assembly confirm the following Bylaws Interpretation / Statement of Findings as approved by the Coordinating Committee on February 5, 2018, establishing the endorsement process for the Standing General Assembly
>  
> Bylaws Interpretation to Establish Process for GPCA endorsements in June 2018 primary 
>  
> Whereas the June 2018 primary elections are operating under the Top Two primary system for statewide office, a system under which it is highly unlikely that any Green Party candidate (or candidate from any other smaller, ballot-qualified
>  
> Whereas the existing GPCA procedures governing endorsements in statewide races were passed at the June 2006 Ventura General Assembly (http://www.cagreens.org/elections/endorsement-procedures) and were designed for general election endorsements under the prior system, under which the Green Party primary election winner automatically appeared on the general election ballot; and
>  
> Whereas at the same time, these same procedures governing endorsements state that in procedure would be brought before the GPCA."; and
>  
> Whereas while existing GPCA rules governing endorsements permit endorsing in Green Party primaries in special circumstances  (
http://www.cagreens.org/elections/endorsement-procedures), under the Top Two primary system, there is no longer a Green Party primary (or other party primary) but only a single non-partisan primary with candidates from all parties running against each other, meaning there will be no primary election held among Green Party members to choose the party's nominees; and

Whereas the criteria for awarding Campaign Support Funds (http://www.cagreens.org/committees/campaign-support/criteria) includes a requirement that any candidate to be considered for such fund must be endorsed by their county party (for a non-statewide race) or the state party (for a statewide race); and

Whereas endorsements of statewide candidates are made by the Standing General Assembly, according to GPCA Bylaws 7-6.2 Decision Items ( http://www.cagreens.org/bylaws/2016-07-03#Section_7-6_Standing_General_Assembly ) which state "The following decision items shall automatically be placed before the Standing General Assembly":   7-6.2(b) Endorsements of statewide candidates (secret ballot); and 

Whereas GPCA Bylaws 7-4 Endorsements ( http://www.cagreens.org/bylaws/2016-07-03#Section_7-4_Endorsements ) state that "A GPCA position to endorse or oppose shall require 2/3."; and

Therefore the Coordinating Committee approves this statement of findings and interprets GPCA Bylaws under 13-3 (http://www.cagreens.org/bylaws/2016-07-03#Article_13-3_Bylaws_Interpretation ) that the findings above establish the special circumstances under which the GPCA should make endorsements in the statewide races in the June 2018 Top Two primary election, and

Whereas there are no existing party rules governing specifically how and which candidates shall be placed before the Standing General Assembly for endorsement; and

Whereas in the case of the party's presidential preference primary ballot - which is not a Top Two primary - under GPCA Rules and Procedures 1-5 (http://www.cagreens.org/rules#Section_1-5_Decision-Making), the GPCA's GPUS Delegation and the GPCAs Campaigns and Candidates Working Group (CCWG) may make recommendations to the GPCA General Assembly for approval by the General Assembly for recommendation to the California Secretary for State for inclusion on the GPCA's presidential primary ballot up to ten days before the General Assembly; and 

Whereas the CCWG on January 28th approved a proposal that the endorsement process state that “all Green candidates who have officially qualified to be candidates on the CA primary ballot by the time of the SGA vote be on the SGA ballot for endorsement”; and

Therefore, the Coordinating Committee finds that it is appropriate for both the Coordinating Committee and the Campaigns and Candidates Working Group to have the authority to recommend consideration of endorsement by the Standing General Assembly for all Green Party candidates who have officially qualified to be on the June 2018 Primary ballot for any/all 2018 statewide offices; and

Whereas an upcoming Standing General Assembly is scheduled to begin its discussion period on Monday February 12 running through Sunday, March 25, with the voting to begin Monday, March 26 and run through Sunday, April 1; and

Whereas the viable candidates for statewide office (those who officially qualify to appear on the Primary ballot) will be determined after the discussion period begins; 

Therefore the endorsement process 6 week SGA discussion period will be timed to the upcoming Standing General Assembly beginning on Monday February 12 and running through Sunday, March 25, and during the discussion period the eligible candidates will be narrowed down from all declared candidates to only those Green Party candidates who will have officially qualified to be on the June Primary ballot by the time of the SGA voting to begin Monday, March 26 and run through Sunday, April 1.  

Resources
None

References
GPCA Bylaws 7-4 Endorsements  http://www.cagreens.org/bylaws/2016-07-03#Section_7-4_Endorsements 

Full details will be available at: http://www.sjcgreens.org/sga_vote_bylaw_interpretations

Please send your discussion comments to gpca-votes at sfgreens.org

--
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes

-- 
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes