[GPCA-SGA-Votes] Fwd: Re: Discuss ID 145: GPCA endorsement for Governor
Bob Marsh
bob at marsh.name
Sun Feb 18 18:52:14 PST 2018
Gloria et al,
The 2% requirement was changed after the TopTwo measure was passed. It’s
more complicated now, as there are two methods for maintaining status
in order to stay on the ballot as a party, mainly for Presidential
elections.
from the CA SoS website:
"Maintaining Its Qualified Status
* Once qualified, a political party maintains its qualified status by:
* Retaining registrants representing at least 1/15 of 1 percent
(0.067%) of the total state registration (Elections Code §§ 5101,
5153); *and*
* Having one of its statewide candidates (running for Governor,
Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Controller, Treasurer,
Attorney General, Insurance Commissioner, or United States Senator)
receive at least 2 percent of the entire vote of the state for that
office at the June 3, 2014, gubernatorial primary election
(Elections Code §§ 5100(a), 5151(b)); *or*
* Retaining statewide registration equaling at least 0.33 percent of
the total number of voters registered on the 154th day before the
primary election or the 123rd day before the presidential general
election. (Elections Code §§ 5100(b), 5151(c).)
“
excerpted from this page at CA Sos site:
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/political-parties/political-party-qualification/
FYI - as of Jan.2, 2018 there were 18,980,481 registered voters state-wide.
0.2% of that = *12,716 *registrants needed, so not a problem for us.
However, we would still need to get 2% of the actual voters in the June
primary, which by the way, had a RECORD low turnout of only 25% in June
2014.
If in June 2018, there is another 25% turnout, then 25% of reg voters is
~4.75M votes, and 2% of that =*94,900 * votes needed for any ONE Green
candidate.
*OR…*
0.33% of registered voters =* 62,635 *registered Greens required. We
appear to have 91,631 as of Jan.2, 2018, so we are probably OK.
cheers,
Bob
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 12:05, Gloria Purcell <gloria at extragalactic.net
> <mailto:gloria at extragalactic.net>> wrote:
>
> Am I incorrect in my understanding that we do not need 2% in the Primary?
> Gloria
>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Anthony Krzywicki
>> <chefkrzywicki at gmail.com <mailto:chefkrzywicki at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> In it to win it is the point of getting 2% then, right? Doesn’t
>> having one candidate give us a better opportunity to get that 2% ?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:22 AM Nicole Castor
>> <nmcastorsilva at gmail.com <mailto:nmcastorsilva at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Anthony & Others,
>>
>> I agree that this process should have been started at least six
>> months ago. At this point, candidates and their teams have already
>> done the work to get on the ballot and it is likely there will be
>> more than one Green candidate for the offices of SOS & Governor.
>>
>> If we're not in it to win it, what is the point? There is a point,
>> actually. We will benefit from having any of the statewide candidates
>> reaching 2%, thus securing ballot access. In addition, Green Party
>> benefits by campaigning our platform, Key Values and the type of
>> electoral reforms which are necessary to empower alternate parties. I
>> do not feel it is useful to delude ourselves into thinking that we
>> are in fact "in it to win it," because until these reforms are
>> accomplished, we are severely disadvantaged in realistically
>> competing to win.
>>
>> I also do not feel it is useful to put so much weight on pandering to
>> so-called "berniecrats," as it dilutes our values in specific ways
>> which compromises what the party actually stands for. Of course such
>> pandering has its merit in reaching registration goals, but for a
>> race like this, we should be careful in pretending we share more in
>> common with that core than we really do.
>>
>> There has to be a party which stands firmly against war, firmly
>> supports environmental protections, among other issues and Sanders
>> does not reflect these values in his actions. There are already
>> "progressive" democrats who will woo voters with compromised ideals
>> and so rather than GP moving to the right, we stand firm, campaign
>> and demonstrate our values to a growing population of individuals who
>> agree, and keep our stances so that we may secure a place for them
>> when they realize the duopoly does not serve their interests and that
>> these voters no longer wish to compromise their values.
>>
>> I will vote against the SGA proposal to endorse candidates at this
>> point because it was brought in too late, serves little purpose and
>> is proposed without a strategy which delegates could examine and
>> decide upon.
>>
>> -Nicole Castor
>> GP Sacramento County
>>
>> On Feb 16, 2018 7:52 AM, "Anthony Krzywicki" <chefkrzywicki at gmail.com
>> <mailto:chefkrzywicki at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Another major concern is breaking up our parties voting base. We
>> need to all get behind someone and that someone hopefully will reach
>> out and get votes from independents, progressives and possibly
>> bernicrats. Otherwise were not in itvto win it, so then whats the
>> point? We have a such a small percentage of green voters to make a
>> win, why should we split that?
>>
>> Also i beliwve that this process should be started 6 months ago, so
>> we could already be backing a unified candidate.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:41 PM james clark <faygodrinkit at gmail.com
>> <mailto:faygodrinkit at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> One major concern is that this process would take power out of the
>> voters hands to decide which candidate best represents their values.
>> It seems to much the DNC and their delegates picking who people get
>> to vote for. Not to mention at several candidates already have their
>> names on the ballot.
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2018 11:14 AM, "Victoria Ashley" <victronix01 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:victronix01 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Since the vote doesn't start until late March, that would give some
>> time to send out a list of all the GP candidates on the Inform List.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:20 AM, John-Marc Chandonia
>> <jmc at sfgreens.org <mailto:jmc at sfgreens.org>> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:25:47PM -0800, james clark wrote:
>>> I feel it is not in the best interests of the party to follow
>>> through with
>>> this ill timed endorsement process. If we were to perform such a
>>> process it
>>> should have been done prior to candidates reaching their ballot access
>>> goals. To do so at this juncture will only create animosity and
>>> division,
>>> and will not effect candidates placement on the ballot.
>>
>> Don't they have until March 9 to raise funds for the ballot? If
>> that's the case, we should know by the time the SGA votes who is in
>> and who is out. I agree that we should not make an endorsement before
>> then, because we haven't had any process for informing Greens about
>> all the Green candidates running.
>>
>> JMC
>> --
>> John-Marc Chandonia (jmc at sfgreens.org <mailto:jmc at sfgreens.org>)
>> http://sfgreens.org/
>>
>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>>
>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>> --
>> Anthony J. Krzywicki,
>> Co-coordinator GROW- Green Party California
>> Co-coordinator Ventura County Green Party County Council
>> www.venturacountygreenparty.com
>> greenpartyvc at gmail.com
>> instagram: greenpartyvcc
>> facebook group: Ventura Green Party
>> facebook group: Ventura County Green Party
>>
>> It is necessary to help others, not only in our prayers, but in our
>> daily lives. If we find we cannot help others, the least we can do is
>> to desist from harming them.
>> -Dali Lama
>>
>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>>
>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>> --
>> Anthony J. Krzywicki,
>> Co-coordinator GROW- Green Party California
>> Co-coordinator Ventura County Green Party County Council
>> www.venturacountygreenparty.com
>> greenpartyvc at gmail.com
>> instagram: greenpartyvcc
>> facebook group: Ventura Green Party
>> facebook group: Ventura County Green Party
>>
>> It is necessary to help others, not only in our prayers, but in our
>> daily lives. If we find we cannot help others, the least we can do is
>> to desist from harming them.
>> -Dali Lama
>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org <mailto:gpca-votes at sfgreens.org>
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice, and
certainly without probable cause. They may do this without any judicial
or legislative oversight. You have no recourse other than petitioning
your elected officials and exercising your constitutional rights. See:
https://ssd.eff.org/ for solutions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/gpca-votes/attachments/20180218/80c20bd9/attachment.html>
More information about the gpca-votes
mailing list