<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;" dir="ltr">
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Send us an easy to remember link to Green Party Forum I believe is the discussion site. Like I just mentioned in state email, why no mention locally or otherwise of pogroms going on against immigrants of color. I suggest,
at least at state level 2 lines: 1 line against anti immigrant pogroms, 2 line Our position of Amnesty for immigrants amidst the horrible growing fascist policies targeting immigrants, specially immigrants of color.</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Yolanda Catzalco</p>
<br>
<br>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> gpca-votes <gpca-votes-bounces@sfgreens.org> on behalf of Eric Brooks <brookse32@hotmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 31, 2018 5:51 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> GPCA Discussion List for SGA Votes<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Gpca-votes] Reminder: GPCA Email Rules of Decorum</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="x_WordSection1">
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Hi all,<br>
<br>
Since we have recently been getting into an email conversation with some disagreement between commenters, I want to take a moment to remind all of the members of the GPCA-Votes list of the GPCA Email Rules of Decorum, which can be found at the following link:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.cagreens.org/it-protocol/email-decorum" id="LPlnk829595" previewremoved="true">http://www.cagreens.org/it-protocol/email-decorum</a><br>
<br>
*<b>Specifically, please take note of the following clauses and please all follow them, so that we can have a respectful dialog.</b>*<br>
<br>
3. No "personality-based" discussion. Speculation or accusations about another's motives, thought processes, or beliefs is off-charter. A focus on 'issues rather than personalities' should be the participants' guiding light. Personal attacks, verbal threats
and/or harassment can be grounds for loss of subscription.</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">4. No misrepresentation of another's work. Participants shall not misrepresent the work of others and shall make a good faith effort to be factually correct.<br>
<br>
6. No insulting, disparaging, degrading, or demeaning language or any other ad hominem attacks. It's never necessary to label others in order to discuss their ideas and activities. Chronic, hurtful sarcasm, or giving people vengeful nicknames, or any other
disrespectful treatment of fellow activists, is grounds for loss of subscription…<br>
<br>
Thanks all,<br>
<br>
Eric Brooks<br>
SGA Vote Administrator</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>