<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-size: 13px;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family: arial, sans-serif;">There have definitely been registered Greens who were much much worse than a non-Green. For instance, a Berkeley Mayoral race in the 2000s featured a well-known local "character"- who happened to be registered Green- running against an extremely qualified ally of local Greens. <br><br>We (Berkeley party members- including us elected Greens) endorsed the non-Green because we knew the nominal Green was an unserious candidate who would only bring ridicule to our party if we backed him. Not only that, he was not active in the local Green Party- for instance, he never came to one Green meeting that I know of besides the county Green endorsement meeting. If the Berkeley Greens had endorsed him, we would've become a laughingstock- at odds with our status as one of the more electorally successful chapters in the state. <div><br></div><div>I am 100% in favor of giving our state party the same flexibility that our county and city chapters have. Goodness knows our Party is inherently unable to come to a snap decision, so I have faith that this and future iterations of the Green Party will perform due diligence for upcoming elections.<br><br>ALSO, one of our prime complaints about the state's Democratic Party is that it bans all of its clubs from endorsing non-Democrats EVEN in non-partisan races. This means that mixed progressive slates (like what routinely are elected locally) are split up and diluted in spite of the strong wishes of our local progressive Dems. <br><br>We see the problems this rigidity causes to us when it's imposed by the duopoly- aren't we supposed to be improving/revolutionizing our system instead of just imitating the big $ parties? </div><div><br></div><div>Yours,</div><div>Jesse Townley</div><div>Berkeley Rent Board, Commissioner and former Chair</div><div>3-term elected official<br><br><blockquote style="padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 0px; border-left: #0000ff 2px solid; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; color: black;">-----Original Message-----
<br>From: Nicole Castor <nmcastorsilva@gmail.com>
<br>Sent: Mar 26, 2018 2:46 PM
<br>To: GPCA-SGA-Vote discussion <gpca-votes@sfgreens.org>
<br>Subject: Re: [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discussion On Items ID 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, 152 & 155: Endorsing Non-Green Candidates For Statewide Office
<br><br><div><div dir="auto">I have serious reservations when it comes to having faith that there could be consensus within the GPCA in deciding if a, “<span style="color:rgb(49,49,49);word-spacing:1px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">Green had major problems with positions at odds with our values and platform,” particularly when SGA dels seem to vote on faction lines.</span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="color:rgb(49,49,49);word-spacing:1px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><br></span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="color:rgb(49,49,49);word-spacing:1px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">Why open the door to such a thing? If this is about McGlauglin, why not propose an endorsement process over specific candidates, rather than writing a blank check right into our bylaws??? </span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="color:rgb(49,49,49);word-spacing:1px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><br></span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="color:rgb(49,49,49);word-spacing:1px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">If this proposal were to pass, there is no way to know now how it may be used/abused in the future, which is why I am voting NO on endorsing non-Greens through GPCA.</span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="color:rgb(49,49,49);word-spacing:1px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><br></span></div><div dir="auto"><font color="#313131"><span style="word-spacing:1px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">Nicole Castor </span></font></div><div dir="auto"><font color="#313131"><span style="word-spacing:1px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">GP Sacramento County</span></font></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:12 PM Jane Jarlsberg <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:jjarlsberg@gmail.com">jjarlsberg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">I agree with
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">Linda Piera-Avila, and no one asked me to write my opinion either!! i have my own mind on these issues, but sometimes someone else is
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">better</span>
able to articulate my thoughts for me!! peace, Jane Jarlsberg</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Linda Piera-Avila <span><<a target="_blank" href="mailto:lindap_a@verizon.net">lindap_a@verizon.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">If a candidate is supportive of our values and doesn’t take corporate donations, that candidate should run as a Green! We will dilute the incentive we have to offer potential recruits if 155 passes. It’s hard enough to vet people who ARE in the Green Party before endorsing them, this will make it even harder if they are not even in our party and this could leave us open to those who would co-opt our ballot line either for their own selfish purposes or worse, to discredit the Green Party. We are a small party - we need to retain our sense as a distinct political party and not give away the store and possibly lose ourselves in the process. <div>Linda Piera-Avila</div><div>Santa Monica</div><div>PS No one asked me to write this. I am very concerned about this proposal on my own! </div><div><br><div id="m_9125518535687073512m_6559242077259554615AppleMailSignature">Sent from my iPhone</div><div><div class="m_9125518535687073512h5"><div><br>On Mar 25, 2018, at 3:11 PM, Eric Brooks <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:brookse32@hotmail.com">brookse32@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div class="m_9125518535687073512m_6559242077259554615WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Hi all,<br>
<br>
In response to Michael Feinstein’s previous emails stating the opinion that items 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, and 152 are not correctly on our SGA ballot, Michael’s statements are incorrect.<br>
<br>
Because Item 155 (see below) would enable us to endorse non-Green candidates for statewide office, as long as they do not take corporate donations and are supportive to the Green Party’s values and platform, items 144 through 152 all are properly on our SGA
ballot and votes for those candidates will be counted if item 155 passes.<br>
<br>
I hope this clears up any confusion.<br>
<br>
Eric Brooks<br>
SGA Vote Administrator<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> gpca-votes [<a target="_blank" href="mailto:gpca-votes-bounces@sfgreens.org">mailto:gpca-votes-bounces@sfgreens.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>GPCA Votes<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, February 15, 2018 12:44 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a target="_blank" href="mailto:gpca-votes@sfgreens.org">gpca-votes@sfgreens.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discuss ID 155: Endorsement Policy Amendment: GPCA Endorsements for General Election Candidates<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><b><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222">Please send your discussion comments to <a target="_blank" href="mailto:gpca-votes@sfgreens.org"><span style="color:#1155cc">gpca-votes@sfgreens.org</span></a></span></b><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#222222">Discussion has begun for the following GPCA SGA ranked choice vote:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ranked Choice Vote ID #155<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ranked Choice Vote <b>Endorsement Policy Amendment: GPCA Endorsements for General Election Candidates</b><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ranked Choice Vote Administrators: Victoria Ashley, Brian Good, Laura Wells, Eric Brooks, Mike Goldbeck<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Discussion 02/12/2018 - 03/25/2018<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Voting 03/26/2018 - 04/01/2018<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Voting ends at Midnight Pacific Time<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Background</b> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Green Party of California is currently prohibited from endorsing candidates who have good Green values and who take no corporate money: the GPCA needs visibility, in a positive way, and putting our name on endorsement lists of good
candidates is one way to get the Green Party name in the public eye. The GPCA wants to help voters vote for good candidates, even in races where we have no candidate. For instance, the Peace and Freedom Party can and does endorse Green Party candidates in
state and federal races, but the GPCA is prohibited from endorsing Peace and Freedom candidates. The GPCA currently cannot endorse candidates with No Party Preference or any other voter registration, even when we have no candidate running in the race. The
GPCA cannot help voters differentiate between good candidates who are aligned with Green values and take no corporate money and bad candidates (who may speak well) from the two-party system. The current endorsement policy is confusing: county parties are
not prohibited from endorsing candidates who are not Green, but the state party is; in addition, it precludes a possible endorsement even in the face of grassroots interest. The current endorsement policy was promulgated in the pre-Top-Two era, and, if left
unreformed, will further hobble party-building efforts in California.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Changing the endorsement policy would advance the party’s attempts to implement Proportional Representation so that we can have a multi-party system and not a two-party system. By expanding our endorsement options, we will demonstrate that
we will work in coalitions and will endorse candidates who have green values, but who choose other political party affiliations. As it stands, people who want to “throw their hat in the ring” and yet who have no track record with the Green Party or allied
organizations are able to register Green and use our ballot line, and get an automatic advantage in the endorsement process, even though they may not be the best candidate. Moreover, given that there are many public perceptions over which Greens have very
little control, such as being marginalized or cast as “spoilers” or “third-party” candidates who “can’t win,” the endorsement area is one we can control. We can avoid marginalizing ourselves as people who are only interested in the label “Green Party,” not
the green values that we share with millions of ordinary folks in the nation and certainly in California. <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Furthermore, it is common advice in social media, for example (and even in life), that if you want likes, followers and friends, you’ve got to like, follow and friend others, as long as you stay true to your values. We need to reciprocate
and be proactive, not sit back and wait for everyone to switch to “team Green Party,” while we display an unwelcoming attitude. People want a new party, but our current restrictive endorsement procedures make us look as if we do not want to be an “umbrella
party” or “big tent” for all people who are aligned with our values and stances. It looks like we want to remain a small, exclusive “third” party with a narrow “sectarian” view of how change happens.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Accordingly, we recommend the following changes to the GPCA Endorsement Policy.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Proposal</b><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">That the current GPCA Endorsement Policy be amended as follows:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">That the policy be amended from its current text:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">GPCA CANDIDATE ENDORSEMENT POLICY FOR GENERAL ELECTIONS (approved by the GPCA General Assembly, June 25, 2006, 43-6-2)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. The GPCA shall not make any endorsements of General Election candidates who are not Green Party members.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">To read as follow:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">GPCA CANDIDATE ENDORSEMENT POLICY FOR ELECTIONS<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. The GPCA shall not make endorsements of candidates who accept corporate campaign contributions or who belong to any political party that accepts corporate campaign contributions.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sponsors: This proposal has been endorsed and sponsored by the Green Party of Yolo County.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Full details will be available at: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sjcgreens.org/sga_vote_bylaw_interpretations">http://www.sjcgreens.org/sga_vote_bylaw_interpretations</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Please send your discussion comments to <a target="_blank" href="mailto:gpca-votes@sfgreens.org">
gpca-votes@sfgreens.org</a></b><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div></div><span class="m_9125518535687073512HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>-- </span><br><span>gpca-votes mailing list</span><br><span><a target="_blank" href="mailto:gpca-votes@sfgreens.org">gpca-votes@sfgreens.org</a></span><br><span><a target="_blank" href="https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes">https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes</a></span><br></div></blockquote></font></span></div></div><br>--<br>
gpca-votes mailing list<br>
<a target="_blank" href="mailto:gpca-votes@sfgreens.org">gpca-votes@sfgreens.org</a><br>
<a target="_blank" href="https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes" rel="noreferrer">https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--<br>
gpca-votes mailing list<br>
<a target="_blank" href="mailto:gpca-votes@sfgreens.org">gpca-votes@sfgreens.org</a><br>
<a target="_blank" href="https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes" rel="noreferrer">https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</gpca-votes@sfgreens.org></nmcastorsilva@gmail.com></blockquote><br><div id="elnk_signature_1522110264367" style="font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; color: black;"><pre></pre></div><br><br></div></div></body></html>