[Sustain] Vote Now! Chronicle Poll: Clean Power or PG&E!

[Eric Brooks]

  Hi all,


  Today's Chronicle has a poll asking whether San Francisco and Marin
  should move forward with Community Choice/CleanPowerSF. (In the poll,
  they call it "public power".)  Of course choose the third option:
  "Yes, and San Francisco should too".


  Vote Now at:
  http://www.sfgate.com/polls/qlist.shtml?/polls/2010/02/04/public , or
  below in the article's left sidebar.

Make your voice heard!  Please Vote now and forward on to others that 
want a clean energy future and local green jobs!  In addition to any 
computers you have, you can also vote from smart phones and PDAs; one 
vote per machine.
PS: PG&E will probably ask their employees to vote from any computers 
they have so its really important that we show strong support for 
Community Choice/CleanPowerSF and Public Power today!

PPS: The article has great news about Marin Clean Energy moving forward.


  Marin County to provide power, oust PG&E

David R. Baker, Chronicle Staff Writer <mailto:dbaker at sfchronicle.com>

Marin County is poised to jump into the public power business, despite 
fierce opposition from Pacific Gas and Electric Co.


    The Question

Should Marin County begin providing public power?

	Yes, way out of the PG&E monopoly
	No, it will wind up costing more
	And San Francisco should too

View Results 
<http://www.sfgate.com/polls/result.shtml?/polls/2010/02/04/public>

Disclaimer <http://www.sfgate.com/polls/disclaimer.shtml>

More Polls » <http://www.sfgate.com/polls/>


    GET QUOTE

Symbol Lookup <http://finance.sfgate.com/hearst?Account=sfgate&Page=LOOKUP>


    MORE BUSINESS

    * House Democrats challenge Comcast, NBC on deal
      <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/02/04/financial/f032250S14.DTL>
      02.04.10
    * World markets plunge on European debt fears
      <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/02/03/financial/f190538S61.DTL>
      02.04.10
    * Shell to cut more jobs as earnings disappoint
      <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/02/03/financial/f234131S91.DTL>
      02.04.10

In a series of votes tonight, officials with the Marin Energy Authority 
are expected to take some of the last key steps necessary to start 
providing electricity to many of the county's residents and businesses, 
taking over a role now filled by PG&E. The organization is a 
joint-powers authority formed by the county and all of its cities except 
Corte Madera, Larkspur, Novato and Ross.

The authority's board is scheduled to vote tonight on a proposed 
contract with Shell Energy North America to line up wholesale 
electricity supplies from power plants, wind farms and solar facilities. 
The board also is scheduled to set the authority's electricity rates, 
matching PG&E's rates for most customers.

"This is the final seal on a lot of the work we've been doing," said 
Dawn Weisz, the authority's interim director. "We've been working on 
this for seven years."

If all goes as planned, the Marin Energy Authority would start supplying 
electricity to some customers in May.

It would be state's first example of a new kind of public power, known 
as community choice aggregation. Created by a state law in 2002, 
community choice allows towns, cities or counties to buy electricity for 
their residents, while traditional utility companies such as PG&E 
continue to own and operate the electrical grid. San Francisco is 
developing its community choice aggregation system.

"I'm just totally thrilled that it's finally happening," said Paul Fenn, 
who drafted the law and now helps communities adopt community choice 
aggregation. "This is a very big thing."

But Marin's plan still faces hurdles placed in its path by PG&E.

The utility, based in San Francisco, argues that Marin residents will 
end up paying more for power in the long run if the authority moves 
forward. PG&E also has complained that, under California's laws, the 
authority should have performed an environmental impact report before 
setting up its system.

PG&E has funded an initiative on the June ballot that would make it far 
harder for anyone to adopt community choice aggregation in the future. 
Although the initiative would come too late to stop Marin, it could 
complicate any efforts by the Marin Energy Authority to expand.

Finally, PG&E has threatened not to deliver electricity to the authority 
over the utility's power lines.

"We are obligated to not deliver power if we believe that (the 
authority) is not complying with (community choice aggregation) tariffs 
and the law," said PG&E spokeswoman Katie Romans.

But the community choice aggregation law explicitly requires utilities 
to cooperate with communities that adopt the system, said Marin County 
Supervisor Charles McGlashan, who also serves as the energy authority's 
chairman. PG&E's threat, he said, "is patently illegal, but they don't 
seem to care."

E-mail David R. Baker at dbaker at sfchronicle.com 
<mailto:dbaker at sfchronicle.com>.

This article appeared on page *D - 1* of the San Francisco Chronicle


Read more: 
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/04/BUN81BS696.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0egPIHnHP 
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/04/BUN81BS696.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0egPIHnHP> 


When this email was sent, we were ahead.


    The Question

Should Marin County begin providing public power?

Yes, way out of the PG&E monopoly (143)
35%
No, it will wind up costing more(93)
23%
And San Francisco should too(170)
42%
Total Votes: 406
Refresh Results 
<http://www.sfgate.com/polls/result.shtml?/polls/2010/02/04/public>
Return to Vote 
<http://www.sfgate.com/polls/qlist.shtml?/polls/2010/02/04/public>







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/sustainability/attachments/20100204/34e1040f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 396 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/sustainability/attachments/20100204/34e1040f/attachment.gif>