[Sustain] Fwd: FW: 19 June Green Action Press Release
Don Eichelberger
done7777 at sbcglobal.net
Wed Jun 19 20:16:37 PDT 2013
Japanese NGO's ask some good questions of their Nuclear Regulatory
Authority about the safety of Japan's continuing to operate reactors.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FW: 19 June Green Action Press Release
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:05:01 +0000
From: Mary Olson <maryo at nirs.org>
To: nirs at sanonofre.com <nirs at sanonofre.com>
I am sure some of you are on the list from Aileen, but I thought I would pass on this item since it is the attention of NGO's after the permanent shut-down of a site on the remaining operating site. CA situation is not identical (thank goodness) but it is parallel.
Mary
Mary Olson maryo at nirs.org
NIRS Southeast
828-252-8409 / cell 828-242-5621
-----Original Message-----
From: Aileen Mioko Smith [mailto:amsmith at gol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:53 AM
To: Aileen Mioko Smith
Subject: 19 June Green Action Press Release
To fellow colleagues from Aileen Mioko Smith (Green Action, Japan):
For immediate release: 19 June 2013
Japan’s Two Operating Reactors won’t meet New Post-Fukushima Standards Will the Nuclear Regulation Authority Still Allow Them to Operate?
Attached is the URL of the press release:
http://greenaction-japan.org/internal/130619_GA_release.pdf
**Notification of a meeting with the government on this issue taking place in Tokyo on Friday, 21 June is at the bottom of this email.
Text of press release:
Kyoto, Japan----The Nuclear Regulation Authority today approved new
post-Fukushima regulatory standards. The standards will now be sent to
the Cabinet for approval. They are scheduled to take effect on 8 July.
Will the NRA ignore compliance with its new standards from day one by
allowing the two currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan, Ohi
Units 3 and 4 to continue to operate, thus setting the precedent for
further non-compliance?
At issue is whether Japan has learned the lessons of the Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear power plant accident and whether Japan’s nuclear power
will really be “the safest in the world” as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
claims.
Japanese NGOs yesterday sent questions to the Nuclear Regulation
Authority (NRA) through a House of Councillors Diet member demanding
answers on whether the NRA intends to comply with its own new
regulatory standards. The questions are to be answered by the Nuclear
Regulatory Agency on Friday, 21 June. (See below for English
translation of the questions and time/location of the meeting.)
The final results of the review on Ohi Units 3 and 4 concerning whether
or not these two operating reactors will be allowed to operate after
the new regulatory standards take effect will probably be announced at
the weekly NRA meeting on Wednesday, 26 June. It has been reported that
the NRA will approve the reactors’ continued operation until their
scheduled outage in September.
----
Questions Concerning Compliance of Ohi Units 3 and 4 to New Regulatory
Standards
The following questions were submitted on 18 June to the Nuclear
Regulation Authority (NRA) via the Mizuho Fukushima Diet office by four
NGOs.
To the Nuclear Regulation Authority:
1. Concerning the conference room located at Units 1 and 2 which is to
serve as the earthquake-resistant control room for Ohi Units 3 and 4
The earthquake-resistant control room for Ohi Units 3 and 4 (maximum
capacity 1000 persons) to be located on the south side of the intake
outlet of the Ohi nuclear power plant site will only become operational
in the autumn of 2015. In the meantime, Kansai Electric states that it
will use a conference room located at the Unit 1 and 2 site.
(1) The conference room at the Unit 1 and 2 site which is to serve
as the center for emergency operations in the event of a serious
earthquake is located right next to Units 3 and 4. Isn’t this too
close to be functional? Is it not correct that the earthquake-resistant
control room should be located at some distance from the reactors?
(2) The conference room is approximately 105 square meters with
capacity for 38 persons. The sole equipment to monitor the state of the
Unit 3 and 4 reactors and other equipment under an emergency is one
personal computer. Is this sufficient for full emergency response?
(3) The earthquake-resistant control room facility is to be
completed around the autumn of 2015. Without such a facility in place,
Ohi Units 3 and 4 do not meet the requirement under the new regulatory
standard. Is that correct?
2. Concerning the Date of Sea-Wall (Tsunami Breakwater) Completion at
Ohi Nuclear Power Plant Site
The Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) has stated that completion of a
sea-wall (tsunami breakwater) is a prerequisite for applying to restart
nuclear power plants.
The breakwater for the Ohi site is not scheduled for completion until
March 2014. This means the Ohi plant site does not meet the requirement
to apply for restart under the new regulatory standard. Is that correct?
3. Concerning the Investigation of the Shattered Zone (Earthquake
Fault) Under the Ohi Nuclear Power Plant
The Nuclear Regulation Authority( NRA) states that nuclear power plant
sites currently undergoing investigation of their shattered zones
(earthquake faults) are required to have their investigation completed
(conclusion reached) before they can apply for permission to restart.
The Ohi F-6 shattered zone (earthquake fault) on-site investigation is
still on-going and experts undertaking the investigation have not
reached a conclusion. Because of this, is it correct that Ohi does not
meet the new safety regulation?
4. Concerning Vent with Filter
The Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) states that for PWR’s,
completion of a vent with filter is a prerequisite for applying for
restarts.
The vent with filter at the Ohi plant will be completed in March of
2016. Because of this, Ohi does not meet the new regulatory standards.
Is that correct?
5. Concerning Basic Earthquake Ground Motion
The Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) has sought that Kansai Electric
“establish a earthquake motion based on 3 earthquake faults
interacting.” However, Kansai Electric continues to use as reference
the basic earthquake ground motion based on 2 earthquake faults
interacting and stated a 3-earthquake fault analysis was only “just in
case.” The utility came out with a new (self-created) category called
“earthquake ground motion for the purpose of the review.”
Since Kansai Electric refuses to meet the demand of the Nuclear
Regulation Authority to establish a basic earthquake ground motion
based on a 3-earthquake fault interaction, this means it does not meet
the new regulatory standards. Is that correct?
6. The Ohi Nuclear Power Plant Units 3 & 4 do not meet the new
regulatory standards, the NRA should therefore require them to be shut
down
It cannot be said that the Ohi nuclear power plant meets the new
regulatory standards when it does not even meet the demands made by the
NRA as indicated above. Because of this, should not the NRA demand that
the Ohi Nuclear Power Plant site immediately cease operations?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
The above questions were submitted by:
Green Action
Mihama-no-Kai
Lawsuit Group to Shut Down the Ohi Nuclear Power Plant
The Nuclear Regulation Authority Citizen Watchdog
For Japanese original of questions see:
http://greenaction-japan.org/internal/130618_question.pdf
----
Meeting With the Nuclear Regulatory Agency Concerning the Ohi Nuclear
Power Plant’s New Regulatory Standards Compliance
(The meeting will be held in Japanese.)
“The Ohi Nuclear Power Plant Site does not Meet New Regulatory
Standards. Shut It Down Now!”
Date: Friday, 21 June
Time: 16:15~17:45 (pre-meeting of citizens begins at 15:45. Media
welcome. Room opens at 15:30.)
Place: House of Councillors Diet Office Building
Room B103
Passes will be issued in the lobby of the House of Councillors Office
Building starting at 15:20
Contact: Aileen Mioko Smith Tel: +81-90-3620-9251
Fee: 500 yen (to help support citizens travelling from other areas of
Japan.)
Meeting organized by Green Action, Mihama-no-Kai, Lawsuit Group to Shut
Down the Ohi Nuclear Power Plant, and, The Nuclear Regulation Authority
Citizen Watchdog
------------------
Aileen Mioko Smith
Executive Director
Green Action
Suite 103, 22-75 Tanaka Sekiden-cho
Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8203 Japan
Tel: +81-75-701-7223
Fax: +81-75-702-1952
Cell:+81-90-3620-9251
email: amsmith at gol.com
URL: http://www.greenaction-japan.org/
http://fukushima.greenaction-japan.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/sustainability/attachments/20130619/392d3375/attachment.html>
More information about the Sustainability
mailing list