<html>
<body>
San Francisco Green Party Sustainability Working Group Meeting
4/26/07<br>
<br>
Agenda: I. CCA; II. Nuclear update; III. LNG, Biofuels; IV. CT’s,
transbay line; V. Greenwashing discussion; VI. Plenary presentation<br>
<br>
I.
CCA- Legislation has finally been introduced to SFBOS on 4/17. We
still expect a tough struggle with the governance issue. SFPUC
wants to oversee the program completely. CCA coalition wants the
board of supervisors to have oversight through creation of a special
oversight board, which should operate at least through the initial
contractor selection process. Legislation goes before the Budget
and Finance Committee in May. If it is not passed in May, it could
set back the effort by another year.<br>
<br>
Discussion:<br>
<ul>
<li>Renewable energy will be a product of 2001 legislation enabling
bonding for renewables projects
<li>Goal of legislation will still be to meet 51% of our energy needs-
360 MW, through renewables and conservation
<li>SFPUC’s plan is to construct much of the renewable energy
infrastructure outside the city. This will still leave the city
dependent upon PG&E’s lines to bring and distribute the power.
We need to see if this can be addressed through more aggressive
distributed energy legislation that will enable more renewable energy
construction within the city.
</ul> <br>
II. Nuclear Update- Don reported on recent efforts by nuclear industry to
reassert itself in California. AB 718 was introduced recently to
repeal the CA ban on building new nuclear facilities until the nuclear
waste can be managed properly. An April 1 meeting brought together
many safe energy activists from across the state who mobilized against
the legislation. It was killed in the Natural Resources
committee, chaired by Lonnie Hancock.<br>
<br>
Discussion:<br>
<ul>
<li>The legislation would have enabled Fresno city administration to move
ahead with plans to builds a nuke.
<li>This is a first assault. The nuclear industry has been
agitating to get nuclear power accepted as a solution to greenhouse gas
emissions.
<li>It is interesting to note how many local groups there are working on
nuclear and other safe energy issues locally in communities all over the
world.
<li>Nuclear is considered a holy grail of modern technology in developing
countries, and nuclear promoters from the US, Japan, Russia and France
are using this to try to sell the technology in India. South Korea, Iran,
South Africa and other places.
<li>They call these “safe reactors”, even though the designs being
promoted are still the same designs- boiling water reactors- as make up
the current infrastructure.
</ul> <br>
III.
LNG, Biofuels<br>
A.. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) facilities have been stopped, for the
time being, by the CA State Lands Commission. Groups in Ventura and
Malibu have packed hearings and agitated against the idea. State
Water Quality Control Board and Governor Schwarzenegger are due to state
their positions soon.<br>
B. Berkeley will soon open the bay area’s first biofuels filling
station. This trend needs to be watched, in line with our concerns
about biofuels (see below) <br>
<br>
IV.
CT’s, Williams settlement- The city is moving along with its plans
to site 4 combustion turbine electric generators. One has been
sited at the airport, and three are slated to go in to southwest SF, near
Potrero Hill along the bay. The turbines came in payment of a
settlement to California by Williams Gas, which gouged gas prices in CA
during the 2000-01 energy crisis. If emplaced, the turbines will
assure the purchase of many millions of dollars worth of gas from
Williams to run the generators. PG&E has announced its
partnership with Williams to provide gas in its service area.
Cal-ISO, the state agency that oversees the state’s energy needs are met
has mandated the siting to assure energy security. They are known
for overestimating power needs, and they seem to embrace a supply-side
ethic.<br>
<br>
Discussion:<br>
<ul>
<li>There are many reasons to oppose these sitings. While the
turbines run somewhat cleaner than traditional generators, they emit a
fine particulate that can be drawn deeper in to lungs and cause severe
problems over time.
<li>Placement of the turbines, coupled with bringing power up the
peninsula through the Jefferson-Martin line, and a proposed line under
the bay to bring power from Pittsburg, CA can severely undermine efforts
to employ conservation and renewable energy projects as proposed in the
CCA.
<li>While the turbines are designed only to be “peakers”, and run only
during peak need, the likelihood is that they will run as much as they
are allowed to by law.
<li>There is also a good chance that the city or a private provider of
energy will want to take advantage of energy markets, and export power
from SF when inland temperatures are high and the city is (usually) cool.
<li>Don will work to write a resolution to take to the general meeting
opposing the CT’s and the transbay underwater line from Pittsburg.
</ul> <br>
V.
Greenwashing- Green is cool, these days, and corporations are
tripping all over themselves to dawn the green mantle, not least of which
our own PG&E. PG&E has sponsored its “Green Is” campaign in
the city and hosted some TV ads featuring the obnoxious, hyperactive
child of a long suffering PG&E employee running around singing the
praises of sun, water, and wind. <br>
<br>
Discussion:<br>
<ul>
<li>There are some spurious ideas being passed as “green”, including
nuclear power, “clean coal” and carbon sequestration, biofuels,
bioplastics, carbon trading, and others.
<li>Concerns were raised about how efficiency and conservation gains
might be used to ramp up production and so maintain current pollution
output
</ul> <br>
VI.
Plenary presentation- We have been asked to produce a presentation for
the upcoming plenary the end of May. It was decided to keep it
simple and focus on biofuels, since there seems to be a great deal of
misunderstanding of this technology among Greens compared to
others. <br>
<br>
Discussion:<br>
<br>
· Jeannie will ask David
Fridley if he can make a presentation. If he is able and willing,
the event will be his presentation, which he can tailor to any
length. <br>
· If he is not able, we
will constitute a panel, made up largely of members of our working
group.<br>
· Eric will clarify the
exact date, and time allotment<br>
· Don is working on a
flyer giving an overview of some of the bad ideas being painted green,
i.e.: nuclear power, “clean coal” and carbon sequestration, biofuels,
bioplastics, carbon trading, and others.<br>
· Working title of the
presentation: “Beware the Green/Industrial Complex”<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>