<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/25/BA80SVJKJ.DTL&hw=peskin&sn=001&sc=1000">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/25/BA80SVJKJ.DTL&hw=peskin&sn=001&sc=1000</a><br>
<div class="headlines">
<h1>SAN FRANCISCO<br>
Peskin thwarted in attempt to gut Environment Dept.</h1>
<h2>City Charter only allows voters to decide fate of the agency</h2>
</div>
<p class="byline">Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Staff Writer</p>
<div id="articlecontent"><span id="bodytext" class="georgia md">
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">sfgate_get_fprefs();
</script>
<p>San Francisco Board of Supervisors President Aaron <strong>Peskin</strong>
quietly introduced a piece of legislation at City Hall this week to
eviscerate an entire city department, just days after the head of that
department broke with <strong>Peskin</strong> and other city leaders
on a major energy policy.</p>
<p>The legislation would eliminate the jobs of all 64 employees of the
San Francisco Department of the Environment - except for its director,
Jared Blumenfeld - but was deemed illegal by the city attorney's office
on Wednesday.</p>
<p>"This is not the first skirmish the board has had with the
Department of the Environment and it probably won't be the last," <strong>Peskin</strong>
said after receiving word from the city attorney that gutting an entire
arm of government whose existence is written into the City Charter just
wouldn't fly.</p>
<p>The charter can only be changed at the ballot box by voters.</p>
<p>Blumenfeld said he was "horrified" when he first learned of the
proposal Wednesday morning, the day after <strong>Peskin</strong>
submitted the one line of legislation without fanfare to the clerk of
the Board of Supervisors.</p>
<p>"The Department of the Environment is recognized time and time again
as the premier local environmental organization in the country," said
Blumenfeld, noting his agency's efforts when the city hosted the U.N.
World Environment Day in 2005.</p>
<p>"I was really disturbed that someone, without even phoning me, would
decide to cut all these great staff people we have in the department,"
he added.</p>
<p>The department, formed after city residents voted to add it to the
charter in 1996, has a budget that has grown steadily over time to just
over $15 million this year. It gets almost no money from the general
fund and instead is financed through grants and projects.</p>
<p>The legislation to effectively dissolve the department followed a
meeting in the mayor's office Friday at which Blumenfeld broke with the
plans of the city Public Utilities Commission - which are supported by
Mayor Gavin Newsom, <strong>Peskin</strong> and other supervisors - to
build a new natural gas-burning power plant near Potrero Hill.</p>
<p>The plant would replace an older, more polluting plant in the area.
It would consist of three "peakers," which means officials would only
turn them on when demand for power was high.</p>
<p>But according to people who attended the meeting, Blumenfeld said he
thought the city should oppose a fossil-fuel power plant and come up
with other alternatives, which put a significant voice in opposition to
the perception of a unified city front on the issue.</p>
<p>Blumenfeld said <strong>Peskin</strong>'s proposal, which was
co-sponsored by Supervisors Gerardo Sandoval and Sophie Maxwell, "is
clearly a shot across the bow to say, 'You know what? Discourse in San
Francisco shouldn't have too much environmental content to it when it
doesn't support the status quo.' "</p>
<p><strong>Peskin</strong> would not address the power plant issue
other than to saying Blumenfeld's stance on the peaker is "rather
nuanced."</p>
<p>He said his legislation is a nonissue because the city attorney must
approve any legislation for it to be considered by the board.</p>
<p>"It's much ado about nothing. I have no intention of moving the
legislation and let's let bygones be bygones," <strong>Peskin</strong>
said.</p>
<p>But several supervisors have deep concerns about the department, <strong>Peskin</strong>
added, referring in part to questions about whether the growth of the
Department of the Environment over the years has been warranted and
whether its work is duplicative of efforts that could be carried
elsewhere in city government.</p>
<p>Sandoval said he would like to find a way to move the proposal
forward and make big changes in the department.</p>
<p>He contended that Blumenfeld ignores the board's suggestions for the
department, such as one Sandoval said he made that some administrators
in the department should be able to speak Spanish or Chinese.</p>
<p>"The Department of the Environment does a pretty good job for the
mayor but is largely unresponsive to priorities that come from the
Board of Supervisors and our constituents," Sandoval said.</p>
<p>Supervisor Sean Elsbernd said he was intrigued by <strong>Peskin</strong>'s
legislation and said he thinks the department has too much overlap with
other city departments in the services it provides.</p>
<p>Maxwell noted that while the department does not draw money from the
city's general fund for basic government services, it does receive
grants that could be spent elsewhere.</p>
<p>"Yes, they do some good work, but it's time to take a closer look,"
Maxwell said.</p>
<p>That's not a universally held sentiment at City Hall or in the
community, however.</p>
<p>Janet Nudelman, an administrator with the Breast Cancer Fund, said
the department has been instrumental in working with the organization
to examine the role of the environment and toxins in disease.</p>
<p>"The department is not only effective in what it is able to
accomplish, but it is truly the most visionary city agency," Nudelman
said.</p>
<p>Newsom's spokesman, Nathan Ballard, said the mayor didn't support <strong>Peskin</strong>'s
move.</p>
<p>Ballard said he did not understand "why anyone would declare war on
the Department of Environment."</p>
<p>Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier, a Newsom ally on the board, lauded
the department for assisting her legislation to ban phthalates, which
soften plastic and have been shown to be toxic, from children's
products and called the legislation to cut the department "outrageous."</p>
<p>Alioto-Pier accused <strong>Peskin</strong> of using his
legislative
power to punish others who don't go along with him, saying she had her
own run-in with the board president this week and wound up paying a
political price when <strong>Peskin</strong> switched his vote to kill
a charter amendment Alioto-Pier was pushing for the February ballot.</p>
<p>Alioto-Pier said she asked <strong>Peskin</strong> about the move
in a meeting in his office. She said he replied by telling her,
"Payback is a bitch."</p>
<p>She said <strong>Peskin</strong> said he was punishing Alioto-Pier
for giving a television interview opposing Proposition A, the Muni
reform measure he sponsored on November's ballot.</p>
<p>Asked about the conversation, <strong>Peskin</strong> said he
wouldn't discuss it, saying he doesn't divulge details of private
conversations he has with other supervisors. But he added that
Alioto-Pier's comments on the conversation "sound to me to be
unfortunate and vindictive."</p>
<p><i>E-mail Wyatt Buchanan at <a
href="mailto:wbuchanan@sfchronicle.com">wbuchanan@sfchronicle.com</a>.</i>
</p>
</span> </div>
<!--/articlecontent -->
<p id="pageno">This article appeared on page <strong>B - 3</strong> of
the San Francisco Chronicle</p>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
"I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara</pre>
</body>
</html>