<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><div><font size="2" color="#ff0000" face="Arial"><strong>Los Angeles
Times</strong></font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"><strong>Obama walks a fine line over
mining</strong></font></div>
<div>
<div class="storysubhead"><font size="2" face="Arial"><strong>Environmentalists feel betrayed by the EPA's
decision not to block new mountaintop mining projects...Tom Hamburger and <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_0">Peter
Wallsten</span></strong><br><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-mountaintop-mining31-2009may31,0,1484453,print.story"><span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_1">http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-mountaintop-mining31-2009may31,0,1484453,print.story</span></a><br>Reporting
from <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_2">Washington</span> — With the election of President Obama, environmentalists had
expected to see the end of the "Appalachian apocalypse," their name for exposing
coal deposits by blowing the tops off whole mountains.<br>But in recent weeks,
the administration has quietly made a decision to open the way for at least two
dozen more mountaintop removals.<br>In a letter this month to a coal ally, <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_3">Rep.
Nick J. Rahall II</span> (D-W.Va.), the <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_4">Environmental Protection Agency</span> said it would
not block dozens of "<span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_5">surface mining</span>" projects. The list included some
controversial mountaintop mines.<br>The industry says the practice of using
explosives to blast away a peak is safer and more efficient than traditional
shaft mining. But critics say the process scars the landscape and dumps tons of
waste -- some of it toxic -- into streams and valleys.<br>The administration's
decision is not the final word on the projects or the future of <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_6">mountaintop
removal</span>. But the letter, coupled with the light it sheds on relations between
the mining industry and the Obama White House, has disappointed
environmentalists. Some say they feel betrayed by a president they thought would
end or sharply limit the practice.<br>The issue is politically sensitive because
environmentalists were an active force behind Obama's election, and the
president's standing is tenuous among Democratic voters in coal states. <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_7">West
Virginia</span>, for example, voted for <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_8">George W. Bush</span> in the <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_9">2000 presidential
election</span> largely because <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_10">Democrat Al Gore</span> was critical of the coal
industry.<br>Moreover, Obama needs support from local lawmakers for an energy
agenda that would further regulate home-state industries, but halting
mountaintop mining could eliminate jobs and put upward pressure on energy prices
in a time of economic hardship.<br>Coal advocates have solicited help from
officials as high up as <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_11">White House Chief of Staff</span> <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_12">Rahm Emanuel</span>. And the issue
has sparked contentious debates within the administration, including one
shouting match in which top officials from two government agencies were heard
pounding their fists on the table, according to sources briefed on the meeting
who requested anonymity when discussing <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_13">White House</span> dealings.<br>The White House
is "searching for a way to walk this tightrope," said Phil Smith, a spokesman
for the <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_14">United Mine Workers of America</span>. "They have a large constituency of
people who want to see an immediate end to <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_15">mountaintop removal</span>, and an equally
large constituency . . . whose communities depend on those jobs."<br>Shortly
after his inauguration, Obama won praise from the green lobby for taking a
skeptical view of the mining process. And in March the EPA announced it would
review the mountaintop projects, breaking from the Bush administration's
practice of granting permits with little or no scrutiny.<br>The EPA has the
authority to block mountaintop removal under the <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_16">Clean Water Act</span>. But if the
agency raises no objections, the final decision on projects is made by the Army
Corps of Engineers, which historically has approved mountaintop mining. The
corps previously had indicated its intention to approve 48 pending
permits.<br>Although environmentalists had expected the new administration to
put the brakes on mountaintop removal, Rahall and other mining advocates have
pointed out that Obama did not promise to end the practice and was more open to
it than his Republican opponent, <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_17">Arizona</span> <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_18">Sen. John McCain</span>.<br>A review of
Obama's campaign statements show that he had expressed concern about the
practice without promising to end it. On a <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_19">West Virginia</span> visit, when asked about
the impact of the mining on the state's streams, he said he wanted "strong
enforcement of the Clean Water Act," adding: "I will make sure the head of the
Environmental Protection Agency believes in the environment."<br>And his EPA
administrator, Lisa Jackson, has said that the agency had "considerable concern
regarding the environmental impact these projects would have on fragile habitats
and streams." She pledged that the agency would "use the best science and follow
the letter of the law in ensuring we are <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_20">protecting our environment</span>."<br>Soon
afterward, the agency in effect blocked six major pending <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_21">mountaintop removal
projects</span> in West Virginia, Kentucky and <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_22">Ohio</span>.<br>But this month, after a series
of <span style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_23">White House meetings</span> with coal companies and advocates including Rahall and
<span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_24">Democratic West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin III</span>, the EPA released the
little-noticed letter giving the green light to at least two dozen
projects.<br>"It was a big disappointment," said Joan Mulhern, a lawyer for
<span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_25">Earthjustice</span>, an <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_26">environmental law firm</span> that has led court challenges to
mountaintop removal. "It's disturbing and surprising that this administration,
headed by a president who has expressed concern about mountaintop removal, would
let such a large number of permits go forward without explanation."<br>Mulhern
charged that the EPA "blew off" Jackson's earlier promises that the agency would
adhere to science and would conduct an open process.<br>Ed Hopkins, a top <span style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_27">Sierra
Club official</span>, said some of the projects that have now obtained the EPA's
blessing "are as large and potentially destructive as the ones they objected
to."<br>"It makes us wonder what standards -- if any -- the administration is
using," Hopkins said.<br>EPA and <span style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_28">White House officials</span> say that about 200
proposed mining projects are under review and that the administration already
had taken steps to break from Bush-era policies.<br>"We want to make informed
decisions guided by science and the law, and a change in such a practice is not
something that happens overnight," said Christine Glunz, a spokeswoman for the
<span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_29">White House Council on Environmental Quality</span>.<br>But after the EPA's initial
announcement in March that it would conduct aggressive reviews, Manchin and
Rahall took the coal industry's concerns to White House officials, including
Emanuel and Nancy Sutley, who heads the <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_30">Council on Environmental
Quality</span>.<br>Manchin said he told the White House that "we are looking for a
balance between the environment and the economy, and they assured me that they
will work with us to find that balance."<br>Environmentalists were stunned to
learn from Rahall's office May 15 that the EPA had given its blessing to 42 out
of the 48 mine projects it had reviewed so far -- including two dozen
mountaintop removals.<br>The news came in a letter to Rahall from Michael
Shapiro, the EPA's acting assistant administrator, who wrote, "I understand the
importance of <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_31">coal mining</span> in <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1243793364_32">Appalachia</span> for jobs, the economy, and meeting the
nation's energy needs.</font></div></div><div id="contentbuttonbarbottom" class="contentbuttonbar msgview clearfix"><br></div></td></tr></table>