<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Ok, I see.<br>
<br>
Maybe, but that might complicate it and make it harder to pass.<br>
<br>
Eric B<br>
</font><br>
On 3/9/2011 3:48 PM, Richard Knee wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D7811B0.1050705@earthlink.net" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
I am not arguing against banning sharkfin soup and taking other
measures to protect sharks. I'm saying the legislation should be
made more expansive.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Rick<br>
<br>
<br>
On 3/9/2011 2:55 PM, Eric Brooks wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D780559.7090809@aim.com" type="cite"> Not
exactly. All ocean life is indeed in danger, but shark are in a
particularly precarious state, and also occupy a particularly
crucial role as top predators, without which entire ocean
ecosystems begin to fail. This inordinately threatens all ocean
species.<br>
<br>
The other important factor in all of this is that eating shark
fin soup is like wearing fur. It is totally unnecessary and
extremely wasteful because once the valuable fins are taken,
most of the shark are thrown back into the ocean to die.<br>
<br>
So the shark fin situation is a serious crisis that needs to be
ended immediately.<br>
<br>
Protecting shark in the ocean is similar to protecting returning
wolves in the Rockies. It is absolutely vital to entire
bioregions.<br>
<br>
And no one would say that since other mammals are threatened we
shouldn't engage immediate special protections for wolves ;)<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
<br>
Eric B <br>
<br>
On 3/9/2011 2:37 PM, Richard Knee wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D780141.3080605@earthlink.net"
type="cite">
<title></title>
Equal protection is needed for other fish. If sharkfin soup is
banned, another type(s) of fish could fall victim to that
supply chain.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 3/9/2011 1:31 PM, Eric Brooks wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D77F1A2.7020600@igc.org" type="cite"> <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mksage@gmail.com">mksage@gmail.com</a>
wrote:<br>
<br>
<div>Please vote to "BAN SHARK FIN SOUP" in the online pole
that the San Francisco Chronicle is holding. Go to </div>
<div> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/03/09/MNBB1I6GV4.DTL">
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/03/09/MNBB1I6GV4.DTL
</a> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>and look down the left side of the article for "THE
QUESTION -- Census finds only 219 great white sharks off
coast"</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Click the button labeled "Ban shark fin soup" and then
click the "VOTE" button.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>-- Mike</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>