Thank you Anthony,

"splitting the base."
This keeps coming up. There were already candidates in these races.
Those same original candidates are less concerned that the vote will split than the people who entered the races later to split the base. It is a "baseless" threat.

"Reach out and get votes"
Broadens the base. 
The June 5 primary is an open primary, which means we aren't competing for green share as much as competing for major party and NPP voters. If every candidate is allowed to proceed with endorsement, each candidate can perform the outreach you profess only one candidate is capable of, to their respective abilities, tripling our return and broadening the base.

"Should be started 6 months ago."
I agree, which is why it is foolish to consider invalidating the labor of three candidates in messaging for the party. If the vote were to proceed with an "endorse all," which it will not, I would support it more. 

Chris 

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 16, 2018, at 7:02 AM, Anthony Krzywicki <chefkrzywicki@gmail.com> wrote:

Another major concern is breaking up our parties voting base.  We need to all get behind someone and that someone hopefully will reach out and get votes from independents, progressives and possibly bernicrats.  Otherwise were not in itvto win it, so then whats the point?  We have a such a small percentage of green voters to make a win, why should we split that?  

Also i beliwve that this process should be started 6 months ago, so we could already be backing a unified candidate.

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:41 PM james clark <faygodrinkit@gmail.com> wrote:
One major concern is that this process would take power out of the voters hands to decide which candidate best represents their values. It seems to much the DNC and their delegates picking who people get to vote for. Not to mention at several candidates already have their names on the ballot.

On Feb 15, 2018 11:14 AM, "Victoria Ashley" <victronix01@gmail.com> wrote:
Since the vote doesn't start until late March, that would give some time to send out a list of all the GP candidates on the Inform List.

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:20 AM, John-Marc Chandonia <jmc@sfgreens.org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:25:47PM -0800, james clark wrote:
> I feel it is not in the best interests of the party to follow through with
> this ill timed endorsement process. If we were to perform such a process it
> should have been done prior to candidates reaching their ballot access
> goals. To do so at this juncture will only create animosity and division,
> and will not effect candidates placement on the ballot.

Don't they have until March 9 to raise funds for the ballot?  If
that's the case, we should know by the time the SGA votes who is in
and who is out.  I agree that we should not make an endorsement before
then, because we haven't had any process for informing Greens about
all the Green candidates running.

JMC
--
John-Marc Chandonia (jmc@sfgreens.org)
http://sfgreens.org/

--
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes@sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes



--
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes@sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes

--
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes@sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
--
Anthony J. Krzywicki,
Co-coordinator GROW- Green Party California
Co-coordinator Ventura County Green Party County Council
instagram: greenpartyvcc
facebook group: Ventura Green Party
facebook group: Ventura County Green Party

It is necessary to help others, not only in our prayers, but in our daily lives. If we find we cannot help others, the least we can do is to desist from harming them.
-Dali Lama
--
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes@sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes