One major concern is that this process would take power out of the voters hands to decide which candidate best represents their values. It seems to much the DNC and their delegates picking who people get to vote for. Not to mention at several candidates already have their names on the ballot.--On Feb 15, 2018 11:14 AM, "Victoria Ashley" <victronix01@gmail.com> wrote:Since the vote doesn't start until late March, that would give some time to send out a list of all the GP candidates on the Inform List.On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:20 AM, John-Marc Chandonia <jmc@sfgreens.org> wrote:On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:25:47PM -0800, james clark wrote:
> I feel it is not in the best interests of the party to follow through with
> this ill timed endorsement process. If we were to perform such a process it
> should have been done prior to candidates reaching their ballot access
> goals. To do so at this juncture will only create animosity and division,
> and will not effect candidates placement on the ballot.
Don't they have until March 9 to raise funds for the ballot? If
that's the case, we should know by the time the SGA votes who is in
and who is out. I agree that we should not make an endorsement before
then, because we haven't had any process for informing Greens about
all the Green candidates running.
JMC
--
John-Marc Chandonia (jmc@sfgreens.org)
http://sfgreens.org/
--
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes@sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
--
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes@sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
gpca-votes mailing list
gpca-votes@sfgreens.org
https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes