Actually, the "Subject line" of this message is such that Stephen (not Stephan) may not see the message. That is, he might just be scanning for "Subject lines" which are specifically related to his candidacy -- and in particular, the "Subject line" of the original message: "Discuss: ID 134 - Election: Coordinating Committee, unscheduled vacancy, one male seat, remainder of July 2016 - June 2018". So if Stephen doesn't respond soon, I suggest that the question be asked "inside" of a message that has the "Subject line" of the "original item" (that is, with a "Subject line" of: "Discuss: ID 134 - Election: Coordinating Committee, unscheduled vacancy, one male seat, remainder of July 2016 - June 2018"). [[Or to be a bit more specific, I think that people who are quickly going through their email "Subject lines" may well think that a "Party growth" subject line means that the message probably just contains"general discussion" on how to build the party -- and not a question for one of the CC candidates!]].
Greg
On Friday, October 6, 2017 5:48 AM, Eric Brooks <brookse32@hotmail.com> wrote:
Oops! Please ignore my comment below!
I did not realize Jeff was asking this question of Coordinating Committee candidates.
By all means proceed with this line of discussion with candidates.
Eric Brooks
-----Original Message----- From: Eric Brooks Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 12:06 PM To: GPCA Discussion List for SGA Votes <gpca-votes@sfgreens.org> Subject: RE: [Gpca-votes] Party growth
Hi Jeff, all,
That is a great question, but we try to keep discussion on this list only to items up for SGA votes and issues related to those votes.
Are you a member of the general discussion group GPCA-Forum?