CALLING ALL SAFE ENERGY ACTIVISTS-

We have time to prevent a speculation bubble being placed around a resurgent uranium mining industry and increased efforts to remove tribal people from their land to get at the energy reasources.  Please contact the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and tell them the public needs more time to review this proposed General Environmental Impact Study aimed at expanding uranium mining. According to the abstract,

"The NRC staff plans to use the GEIS as a starting point for its NEPA analyses for site-specific license applications for new ISL facilities. Additionally, the NRC staff plans to use the GEIS, along with applicable previous site-specific environmental review documents, in its NEPA analysis for the restart or expansions of existing facilities. "

If you can, take some time to review the document, identify a question or two that might come to mind, and write them, state your question(s) and ask for more time for more thorough study.

I will be calling for more time because I cannot get the PDF files on the GEIS page to open, despite having the latest version of Adobe Reader and a fast system. I would like to know if this is a problem for others.

For information on concerns about seeing a resurgence in mining in the Four Corners, see this article by the Gallup Independent:

http://www.gallupindependent.com/2008/09september/091008nrc.html

I don't think I need say more.

Thanks for your effort,

Don

Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:50:32 -0700
From: roger Herried <rogerh@energy-net.org>
To: Don Eichelberger <done7777@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: GEIS ISL Uranium Mining Alert
 

NRC: GEIS - In-Situ Leach Uranium Mining



Urgent Alert: Draft Uranium Mining GEIS delay requests needed

The NRC is closing the comment period on October 7 for the draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (NUREG-1910, Vol. 1) for approval of in-situ leach uranium mining operations . It is absolutely critical that we get as many comments before the NRC either online or by letter calling for an extension of at least 90 - 180 days before closing the comment period.   Handwritten comments must be postmarked by September 26, 2008!
The DEIR  is here:  http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1910/

This is more than just a minor delay tactic! The country is fully aware of the fact that energy market traders have driven up the price of oil and other commodities. Using the Enron loophole we have seen the price of uranium reignite a new push to uranium mining industry here and elsewhere. Delaying this GEIS long enough for a new administration to finally force the CTFC and congress to remove the Enron loophole will save ratepayers from eating another bubble, as well as putting a focus on the NRC's agenda of ramroding unsafe ISL practices through.

The Bush administration and USEC have been attempting to start a new cold war with Russia as well dismantling the MOX fuel exchange program. Any wonder why?

PLEASE RESPOND- NRC NEEDS TO SEE AS MANY REQUESTS FOR DELAYS AS POSSIBLE!

Electronic comments may be submitted to the NRC by the Internet at  NRCREP.Resource@nrc.gov

Online Comment Weblink

Ground Mail address:

Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Mail Stop T6-D59
Washington, DC 20555-0001



For any questions about the material in this report, please contact:
J. Park
TWFN T8-F5
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555-0001
Phone: 301-415-6935
E-mail: James.Park@nrc.gov

The NRC will not address comments on the following issues:
1. NRC's licensing process and the decision to prepare the Draft GELS.
2. General support or opposition for GElS or uranium milling.
3. Requests for cooperation or agreements.
4. Matters that are regulated by Agreement States.
5. Impacts associated with conventional uranium milling past or present.
6. Requests for compensation for past mining impacts.
7. Resolution of dual regulation issues.
8. Consideration of human-induced climate change.
9. Analysis of all variations of ISL technology.
10. Alternative sources of uranium.
11. Cumulative Impact Analysis.
12. Energy debate.
13. NRC credibility.
 
The NRC does want us to review the current draft GEIS and make comments concerning the following items.
1. Proposed Action and Alternatives.
2. Applicable Statutes, Regulations, and Agencies.
3. Purpose of the Draft GElS and Use in Site-Specific Licensing Reviews.
4. Opportunities for Public Involvement.
5. Applicable Rulemaking Activities.
6. Land Use.
7. Transportation.
8. Geology.
9. Water Resources.
10. Ecology.
11. Meteorology, Climatology, and Air Quality.
12. Noise.
13. Historic and Cultural.
14. Visual Resources.
15. Socioeconomics.
16. Public and Occupational Health.
17. Waste Management.
18. Decontamination, Decommissioning, Reclamation.
19. Accidents.
20. Environmental Justice.
21. Cumulative Impacts.
22. Monitoring.
23. Financial Assurance.
 
In other words, read the GEIS and help sanity return to our energy policy. Let's take back our energy policy from the foreigners controlling our economy.
If enough of us request an extension to the deadline ending the comment period, the NRC will grant our request, regardless of what Wyo. Gov. Freudenthal says. But whatever you do, don't use comments such as NUKES IS BAD, read the GEIS first. My personal feeling is that it is just a high priced prospecting guide for the foreign controlled uranium mining companies using American lackeys to promote their agendas!


Don Eichelberger
DJ Fix Independent Productions

My Blog
www.greenuprising.blogspot.com

My You Tube
http://www.youtube.com/DonnyFix

My Space

http://www.myspace.com/donnyfix

Donny Fix del.icio.us book marks

http://del.icio.us/donnyfix

The Hegelian/Marxist goal is emancipation.  Marx said it best in 1843:

"Human emancipation will only be complete when the real, individual man (sic) is absorbed into himself the abstract citizen; when as an individual man, in his every day life, in his work and in his relationships, he has become a species-being (politically accountable to the whole); and when he recognizes and realizes his own power as social powers, so that he no  longer separates this social power from himself as political power."