I am troubled by the huge extent this article depended- quoted pretty much the whole thing word for word - a propaganda piece aimed at discrediting CCA issued by PG&E. First, it is full of the kinds of disinformation PG&E is famous for. PG&E has a history of fighting dirty. In 2000, these same falsehoods were published on SF newspaper front pages in an article issued by a PG&E front group on election day. The $20 thousand fine they gladly paid saved them millions. The 360 Mw pledge, to provide that amount of conservation and renewable energy to meet city energy needs as quickly as possible is doable. Once built- using revenue bond money for renewable energy that SF voters DID approve in 2000- residents will have that much protection from the erratic costs of fossil fuels in energy production. What troubles me most, though, legislation that instituted CCA included prohibitions against local utilities using their deep pockets to influence the debate. You are complicit!