One more thing- We need to get the input from the Housing and Land Use working group. They met last night, so maybe they talked about it. If not, this should go through them. Dave Wilbur was a bit concerned last time when we put this on the agenda without getting the HLU feedback first, since this is a land use (and transportation) issue. peace, susan -----Original Message----- From: "susan_e_vaughan@juno.com" <susan_e_vaughan@juno.com> Sent: Sep 7, 2005 12:40 PM To: m@micheas.net, transpo@sfgreens.org Cc: funking@mindspring.com, cc@sfgreens.org, grns-sf-staff@greens.org, tjohnsto@hotmail.com, dave_peterson@pobox.com Subject: Hone Depot: suggestion for a blanket statement opposing it Great idea. Sue -- Micheas Herman <micheas.herman@gmail.com> wrote: Forwarding a request that has been made to me by several members. Could we agendize a statement of policy opposing the opening of a HomeDepot in the City and County of San Francisco? I believe Mark Barns and/or Bruce Wolfe have a list of substantive whereas clauses for the policy statement. (Net Job loss, Corporate Drain on the Local economy, Traffic issues of monster big box stores, selling old growth timber, etc.) At least a few of the votes against opposing the EIR made statements implying that they would accept a blanket statement against HD instead of a statement against an EIR would cause this to become like Golden Gate Park, an issue that keeps coming back distracting us from moving forward. -- Micheas Herman (415)424-5881 _______________________________________________ San Francisco Green Party CC mailing list CC@sfgreens.org To unsubscribe or change options, go here: https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cc