2. Email and call the following Supervisors
Let them know that they should oppose the proposal to raid the public
campaign financing fund (see more detailed talking points below)
Bevan Dufty
bevan.dufty@sfgov.org
554-6968
Sophie Maxwell
sophie.maxwell@sfgov.org
554-7670
Gerardo Sandoval
554-6975
gerardo.sandoval@sfgov.org
Would result in severe underfunding for future races
According to Ethics Commission spending projections, were this proposal
to pass and the funds not be returned at a later date, the 2011 mayoral
race would be $1.5 million - $4.3 million short of the $6 million
minimum needed for a mayoral race, assuming the program receives full
funding in upcoming years and that there are no additional raids on the
fund. In order to make up the shortfall would require a $3.3 - $6
million appropriation to the program in fiscal year 2010-2011. With no
prospects of an improving budget situation, this is unlikely to occur.
What will happen next year?
The logic of taking money out of the
fund based on a budget shortfall will leave the program bankrupt. With
budget shortfalls likely to continue into the near future, even if no
more money is removed, it's unlikely that the program would receive
full appropriations, plus the necessary supplementals.
Sets a dangerous precedent
It's poor public policy to have sitting
politicians setting the specific level of funding for public campaign
funding programs on an annual basis,
since in general, publicly funded elections threaten incumbents by
enabling less well-financed competitors to compete on a level playing
field. Opening the door to this now will likely lead to renewed
proposals to raid the fund on an annual basis.
No guarantee of return of the funds
Nothing short of a Charter Amendment approved by voters can legally
guarantee the return of the funds, since the Charter grants budget
authority to the Mayor and Board of Supervisors. An amendment to the
Campaign Finance Reform Ordinance has no legally binding mechanisms as
it relates to budgetary matters.
This proposal has not come with any specific timelines or amounts
While there has been talk of ensuring "adequate" funding for the
program in the future, there have been no specific details given of
what adequate means, and when that would be determined.
Much larger cut than other programs
The $5 million cut is equivalent
to 2.5 years of funding for this program, or a 250% cut. In fact, the
$1.8M appropriated this
year is already about 10% short of what the formula suggested in the
Campaign Finance Reform Ordinance recommends.
Public campaign financing saves money in the long run
By reducing the pay-to-play dynamic, where politicians feel
incentives to give costly legislative favors to campaign contributors,
public campaign financing saves far more than it costs in the long run.
Our organization found $70 million in media-documented giveaways to
campaign contributors in the space of just a few years, before the
public funding program went into effect. Check out our examples:
http://voterownedelections.org/save_money.html
------------------
Robert Arnow
San Franciscans for Voter Owned Elections
www.voterownedelections.org
415-552-2229