[Gpca-votes] Minutes content

[Jeff Lebow]

Victoria,
Not saying the minutes are not improved. My feedback was offered to encourage the inclusion of the essence of discussions, as opposed to that they occurred. It took me a few college years to learn how to distill my class notes to the critical information. I’m still working on that. 
In solidarity,
Jeff Lebow

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 5, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Victoria Ashley <victronix01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Jeff, for comparison, you can see the minutes from previous GAs at this page:
> 
> http://www.cagreens.org/ga/archive
> 
> Ideally we would like all of our teleconferences and meetings to be fully recorded, so everyone has all of the information, but the current minutes are as good as or more so, than most of our GA minutes.  At some points in the past, the GA host organization has found a minutes-taker who can be paid, and is not also part of running or hosting the meeting.
> 
> Perhaps we can do that at Ventura.
> 
> Thanks,
> Victoria
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Jeff Lebow <jlebow at socal.rr.com> wrote:
>> These minutes include several entries informing us that a discussion occurred without any specifics as to the content of the discussion, leaving the reader in the dark as to what was said. I found these minutes, aside from the BLM endorsement, lacking and less than informative as it could be.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
> 
> -- 
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/gpca-votes/attachments/20171005/358ccbea/attachment.html>