[GPCA-SGA-Votes] Fwd: [gpca-forum] Endorsing Dems?!?!?
cab
2call41cab at gmail.com
Thu Apr 19 21:34:48 PDT 2018
Sounds good. We could also include the 4 pillars and/or TKV.
On 4/19/2018 6:14 PM, 1 wrote:
> Is anyone here familiar with CFAR? Anyone?
>
> Hey, Dumbocrats (neoliberal/corporatist judiciaries, legislators &
> executives at the state and federal political level, not the U.S.
> Voting Republic) are the left side of the Repiglicans (the crazies,
> not the U.S. Voting Republic), they both suck, and we all know that,
> but the CFAR
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/v7qb21a0lp3j1ce/CFAR%20Template_House%20of%20Representatives.pdf?dl=0>
> is missing one important demand... "_Allow 3rd or more political
> parties to participate on the debate stage - no matter what the polls
> say._"
> We must demand many things from those that we endorse, including the
> CFAR
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/v7qb21a0lp3j1ce/CFAR%20Template_House%20of%20Representatives.pdf?dl=0>,
> and most importantly to allow Greens in Debates and, the CFAR
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/v7qb21a0lp3j1ce/CFAR%20Template_House%20of%20Representatives.pdf?dl=0>
> does not have that indicated, anywhere.
>
> I strongly believe that we need our own contract with those that we
> support/endorse that are not Greens, and it should include the following:
> The Green New Deal
> Allow 3rd + Parties to Debate
> CFAR
> uhhh, that's all I can think of right now.
>
> Mahalo, all!
>
> James Young
> SGA O.C. / MCM GPCA
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *1* <jbrjaw1 at gmail.com <mailto:jbrjaw1 at gmail.com>>
> Date: Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 5:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [gpca-forum] Endorsing Dems?!?!?
> To: GPCA member general discussion <gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org
> <mailto:gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org>>
>
>
> Is anyone here familiar with CFAR?
> Hey, dems are the left side of the repubs, the both suck, and we all
> know that, but the CFAR is missing one important demand...
> "Allow 3rd or more political parties to participate on the debate
> state - no matter what the polls say."
> We must demand many things from those that we endorse, including the
> CFAR, and most importantly to allow Greens in Debates.
> Which, the CFAR does not have, anywhere.
> We need our own contract with those that we support/endorse that are
> not Greens.
>
> James Young
> SGA O.C. / MCM GPCA
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:07 PM, james clark via gpca-forum
> <gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org <mailto:gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org>>
> wrote:
>
> Noticing a certain county endorsing a lot of demoncrats. I find
> this problematic as it helps raise up a corrupt party, and works
> to delegitimize the values of the green party. Should county's not
> seeking to find greens to run, or find non corporate party
> candidates rather than endorse candidates from a party we are
> trying overcome? If we are to be taken seriously we should avoid
> empowering the very party's that fight against greens having a
> place on the ballot. Thoughts??
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpca-forum mailing list
> Reminder: Please do not "Reply All" or include other addresses in
> the CC line -- only use "Reply"
>
> gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org <mailto:gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org>
> http://lists.cagreens.org/listinfo/gpca-forum_lists.cagreens.org
> <http://lists.cagreens.org/listinfo/gpca-forum_lists.cagreens.org>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/gpca-votes/attachments/20180419/88a7ac1f/attachment.html>
More information about the gpca-votes
mailing list