[GPCA-SGA-Votes] PLEASE READ: Always Put Your Name & Affiliation At The End Of SGA List Emails (was RE: Green Party Sex Tape video)

Wed Mar 7 17:23:52 PST 2018

Roger-that!
James Young
Orange County CA

<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Eric Brooks <brookse32 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nassim, all,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> This is why the GPCA email list rules direct everyone to put their full
> name and county (or if appropriate a committee or working group
> affiliation) at the end of all emails so everyone knows who is speaking.
>
> This is a big list so please follow that rule to reduce confusion.
>
> Eric Brooks
> SF, CA
>
> SGA Vote Admin
>
>
>
> *From:* gpca-votes [mailto:gpca-votes-bounces at sfgreens.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Nassim Nouri
> *Sent:* Monday, March 05, 2018 5:08 PM
> *To:* GPCA-SGA-Vote discussion <gpca-votes at sfgreens.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Green Party Sex Tape video
>
>
>
> There seems to be a technical issue with this thread.
>
> Somehow Nicole responded to Sadie’s question directed to Angelica?!
>
>
>
> I have seen this happen before on some threads and was wondering if there
> is a technical problem that mixes up respondents’ identity and/or emails.
>
>
>
> I know as a technical issue this is not on topic, but if there’s a glitch
> confusing the identity of SGA members on these threads it needs to be
> fixed.
>
> I assume this is a topic for the list admins? Or should IT investigate?
>
>
>
>
>
> Nassim Nouri
>
> Green Party of Santa Clara County
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Nicole Castor <nmcastorsilva at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I had not said anything remotely close to implying sex work is disturbing,
> offensive, embarrassing, etc.
>
> What is disturbing, offensive, embarrassing is that the video seems to be
> mocking a legitimate occupation, painting it as a sort of "last resort" to
> stoop to out of desperation in meeting financial goals. Would the video be
> funny if you replaced sex tape with "taking a job as a receptionist" to pay
> for filing fees?
>
> I had posted an article above, which a similar one is now posted, which
> illustrates popular sentiment regarding a troubling stance of GP on sex
> work, and i shared this to demonstrate that we ought to be careful in the
> impression we give.
>
> -N
>
> While we are here, it is important that I mention, there is absolutely
> nothing “disturbing” “offensive” or “embarrassing” about sex work. By
> stating that this concept is so offensive to you, this is what you are
> stating and I don’t believe that is acceptable.
>
> Furthermore, if you listen to the video and script you will hear that this
> video was ALSO intended to draw attention to that fact. As a statement
> against slut shaming, and for the media to draw more attention to things
> that matter. Like Monsanto and Chevron corruption. Which, by the way, is
> something I know MANY greens are actively fighting for.
>
> You being offended by the idea of sex work, is unfortunate. I am sorry
> that you were not able to see past your prior indoctrination to see the big
> messages being a video made humorous to get the message out to demographics
> who don’t see the messages we do in our formats.
>
> I would implore you to look into this topic.
> https://theestablishment.co/the-green-party-is-failing-
> sex-workers-586329848557
>
> On Mar 5, 2018 1:59 PM, "Sadie Fulton" <sadie.fulton at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jane. Yes, it did. We have a ways to go still, but many people are
> seeing it and donating who wouldn't ordinarily do so.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:33 PM Jane Jarlsberg <jjarlsberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sadie Fulton,
>
> i guess the bottom line on this thread is did this satire help raise funds
> for your campaigns?!  peace, Jane
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Jane Jarlsberg <jjarlsberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> i meant to address this question to Sadie Fulton.  Jane
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Jane Jarlsberg <jjarlsberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> i guess the bottom line on this thread is did this satire help raise funds
> for your campaigns?!  peace, Jane
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:13 AM, Sadie Fulton <sadie.fulton at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Angelica,
> When you raised your objection to this video you had not even watched it.
> Have you watched it yet?
> Sadie
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 02:05 Angelica Duenas <angelica at aduenas.org> wrote:
>
> Dear SGA delegates
>
> I am very disturbed by the Green Party Sex Tape video (
> https://youtu.be/dxhUS-QQPbg) created and posted by Gubernatorial
> candidate Josh Jones. I find the video offensive and an example of
> extremely poor judgment by someone seeking to represent our party as a
> candidate for our state’s highest office.
>
> I was first introduced face to face with the Green Party at the August
> 2016 Green Party national convention in Houston, which I attended as an
> interested observer, after being turned off by the Democratic Party (as a
> Berniecrat delegate at the Democratic National Convention a week earlier.)
>
> At the GPUS convention, I met David Cobb, Laura Wells, Mike Feinstein,
> Jill Stein, Ajamu Baraka, Cornel West (when things looked like he might Go
> Green) and Luis Rodriguez (the GPCA's 2014 Gubernatorial candidate). Based
> upon those interactions, I was impressed by the Green Party, effectively
> going Green the following month. Since then, I have learned a lot about the
> Green Party and its inner workings. I love how there is a high value on
> internal democracy. And I love the GPCA and GPUS platforms – solid.
>
> But I have to say that if I would have come across this Josh Jones Sex
> Tape video in 2016 prior to attending the Green Party convention, I would
> have not given the Green Party a chance at all. The concept and content is
> immature and damaging to our party.  A more thoughtful treatment could have
> been a great PSA moment.  Instead it is an embarrassment, plain and simple.
>
> Given this, for anyone seeking our party’s endorsement, I think the video
> should be deleted from YouTube. But at a minimum, if this embarrassment is
> to remain on-line, the use of the words “Green Party” should be removed
> from the video's title. No one in our party has the right to post something
> like that, misrepresenting our party’s name in that manner.
>
>
>
> Disappointed in Los Angeles,
> Angelica Dueñas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Angelica M. Duenas, M.A.
>
> *GPLAC Councilmember*
>
> *GYG Delegate*
>
> *GPCA CC Member*
>
> *GPUS Alternate Delegate*
>
>
>
> *"You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one" *- John Lennon
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
>
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
>
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/gpca-votes/attachments/20180307/31276a58/attachment.html>