[Sustain] The Bay Guardian is in outer space on the peaker issue!
Richard Knee
rak0408 at earthlink.net
Thu Jun 12 08:39:37 PDT 2008
Perhaps one of you should write a letter to the editor or an op-ed
article. I'd offer to do it, except that I don't have the breadth or
depth of knowledge on the issue that you folks do.
Best,
Rick
Eric Brooks wrote:
> It's pretty simple really. Bruce Brugmann has this totally absurd idea
> that PG&E doesn't want the plant built because the City might use it
> as an anchor for public power, (an assumption that is highly
> questionable because of the expense of the peakers and the likelihood
> that they will put the City into deep debt amidst rising natural gas
> prices). But in Bruce's mind anything that PG&E doesn't like must be
> good, and so he sees the peakers as a public power move to oust PG&E
> (never mind that it is a totally ridiculous idea to get public power
> by polluting the City and the atmosphere). The truth is that a small
> 150 megawatt peaker plant wouldn't do a damned thing to anchor public
> power in the City. He is unable to see the issue as the very complex
> game that it actually is, and he is equally unable to get through his
> head that no matter what PG&E wants, this planet cannot handle any
> more fossil fuel plants.
> The real reason that PG&E is opposing the peaker plant is that this
> gives them an excuse to propose their spending upwards of $500 million
> on a transmission upgrade to prevent the peakers, and this will give
> them still deeper control of our energy grid because it will make it
> cost $500 million more to take over the PG&E lines.
>
> This is why we need to keep pushing for a renewable energy solution
> which will make both Mirant and the peakers unnecessary, -and- will
> obviate any excuse for PG&E to build new transmission lines.
>
> asumchai at sfbayview.com wrote:
>>> Eric...can you make sense of Bruce and the Bay Guardian editorial board?
>>>
>> It's as if they are in a self serving "outer space" on the Peaker issue.
>> Ahimsa
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>> See attached.
>>>
>>> This communication shows clearly that we were misled by SFPUC staff and
>>> that the new Peaker plant is not necessary.
>>>
>>> peace
>>>
>>> Eric Brooks
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sustainability mailing list
>>> Sustainability at sfgreens.org
>>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainability
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sustainability mailing list
> Sustainability at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainability
>
More information about the Sustainability
mailing list