A. Gregory Wonderwheel is a Green attorney who is upset that the treasurer election was not conducted per the bylaws. They state that the GPCA CC is to nominate a treasurer subject to approval/confirmation by the plenary. He has asked me if I'd be a plaintiff to a lawsuit against the GPCA to overturn that. My response was that I am agnostic on the treasurer's race but was disgusted at the cavalier attitude wielded by the CC and facilitation team towards the bylaws and would consider his office. It might serve as an object lesson to take the state party to court to ask that the Sylmar plenary be deemed illegal for several violations of the bylaws. This might end the regime of fast and loose interpretations as well as on the fly agenda changes. Since GDI did not get 80%, the CC is reporting the numbers to the national so that "they can speak for themselves." Again, that option was not before the plenary. My first instinct was to take the temperature of the SFGP delegation on whether proceeding would be a good idea or not. Any thoughts? -marc