And we are meeting on THursday evening, 7 p.m., correct? Sue Eric Brooks <brookse32@aim.com> wrote: Here are three perspectives: for: http://www.yeson91.net/ against: http://ca.lwv.org/action/prop0802/flyer.html http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2007/11/the_california_43.html My take on this is that increasing transportation outlays does not in any way guarantee transit funds, that such initiatives are an extremely blunt instrument through which to achieve mass transit goals, and that Prop 91 could result in actually amplifying undesirable road and highway construction. If we want to fund mass transit, we should put forward specific, targeted measures, which do so, not measures like Prop 91. cheers Eric susan vaughan wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Here's the link to February 5 propositions on the state ballot. Within is also a link to the Prop 91 text.
Sue
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_j.htm#2008Primary
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
-- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." -- Che Guevara _______________________________________________ Transpo mailing list Transpo@sfgreens.org https://list.sfgreens.org/mailman/listinfo/transpo --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.