I hate their sections on BRT (assumes light-rail is too expensive; doesn't define "rail-ready" or examine the real-world possibility of these new bus-lines ever being converted to surface rail) and the Transbay Terminal (doesn't consider the no-build option of leaving the beautiful old Deco building alone, renovating it, and RE- installing tracks along the elevated ramp that used to be a rail- line). Aside from that it looks good. Both these platforms feed into the current "party-line" about these two key areas, which I think are too knee-jerk and don't consider carefully enough the possibility of better options. --K. On Nov 10, 2007, at 4:07 PM, dave@livablecity.org wrote:

I've read it over and I vote yes.

On Nov 10, 2007, at 1:15 PM, John-Marc Chandonia wrote:

...

Please read over the TALC platform (forwarded separately)

_______________________________________________ Transpo mailing list Transpo@sfgreens.org https://list.sfgreens.org/mailman/listinfo/transpo

"Let's have a moment of silence for all those Americans who are stuck in traffic on their way to the gym to ride the stationary bicycle." - Earl Blumenauer