[GPCA-SGA-Votes] Fwd: [gpca-forum] Endorsing Dems?!?!?

[Nicole Castor]

Did someone say it was Yolo County?

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 7:45 PM Erik <erikrydberg34 at gmail.com> wrote:

> If the Green Party of Yolo County chooses to endorse candidates in a
> Non-Partisan Race that happen to be registered Democrats and they have no
> Green option... that is their decision to make. They are the authority in
> their county. Non-Partisan races are not allowed to promote political
> party. The Green Party of Yolo County know their own political environment
> better than anyone from GP Sacramento. It is not the business of any member
> of GP Sacramento whatsoever.
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:50 AM cab <2call41cab at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good.  We could also include the 4 pillars and/or TKV.
>>
>> On 4/19/2018 6:14 PM, 1 wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone here familiar with CFAR? Anyone?
>>
>> Hey, Dumbocrats (neoliberal/corporatist judiciaries, legislators &
>> executives at the state and federal political level, not the U.S. Voting
>> Republic) are the left side of the Repiglicans (the crazies, not the
>> U.S. Voting Republic), they both suck, and we all know that, but the CFAR
>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/v7qb21a0lp3j1ce/CFAR%20Template_House%20of%20Representatives.pdf?dl=0>
>> is missing one important demand... "*Allow 3rd or more political parties
>> to participate on the debate stage - no matter what the polls say.*"
>> We must demand many things from those that we endorse, including the CFAR
>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/v7qb21a0lp3j1ce/CFAR%20Template_House%20of%20Representatives.pdf?dl=0>,
>> and most importantly to allow Greens in Debates and, the CFAR
>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/v7qb21a0lp3j1ce/CFAR%20Template_House%20of%20Representatives.pdf?dl=0>
>> does not have that indicated, anywhere.
>>
>> I strongly believe that we need our own contract with those that we
>> support/endorse that are not Greens, and it should include the following:
>> The Green New Deal
>> Allow 3rd + Parties to Debate
>> CFAR
>> uhhh, that's all I can think of right now.
>>
>> Mahalo, all!
>>
>> James Young
>> SGA O.C. / MCM GPCA
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: 1 <jbrjaw1 at gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 5:15 PM
>> Subject: Re: [gpca-forum] Endorsing Dems?!?!?
>> To: GPCA member general discussion <gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org>
>>
>>
>> Is anyone here familiar with CFAR?
>> Hey, dems are the left side of the repubs, the both suck, and we all know
>> that, but the CFAR is missing one important demand...
>> "Allow 3rd or more political parties to participate on the debate state -
>> no matter what the polls say."
>> We must demand many things from those that we endorse, including the
>> CFAR, and most importantly to allow Greens in Debates.
>> Which, the CFAR does not have, anywhere.
>> We need our own contract with those that we support/endorse that are not
>> Greens.
>>
>> James Young
>> SGA O.C. / MCM GPCA
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:07 PM, james clark via gpca-forum <
>> gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Noticing a certain county endorsing a lot of demoncrats. I find this
>>> problematic as it helps raise up a corrupt party, and works to delegitimize
>>> the values of the green party. Should county's not seeking to find greens
>>> to run, or find non corporate party candidates rather than endorse
>>> candidates from a party we are trying overcome? If we are to be taken
>>> seriously we should avoid empowering the very party's that fight against
>>> greens having a place on the ballot. Thoughts??
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gpca-forum mailing list
>>> Reminder: Please do not "Reply All" or include other addresses in the CC
>>> line -- only use "Reply"
>>>
>>> gpca-forum at lists.cagreens.org
>>> http://lists.cagreens.org/listinfo/gpca-forum_lists.cagreens.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> gpca-votes mailing list
>> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
>> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>>
> --
>
> *Erik Rydberg *
>
> *Green Party of California(GPCA) Spokesperson*
>
>
> *erikrydberg34 at gmail.com <erikrydberg34 at gmail.com>530-781-2903*
>
>                 cagreens.org
>
>
> --
> gpca-votes mailing list
> gpca-votes at sfgreens.org
> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpca-votes
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sfgreens.org/pipermail/gpca-votes/attachments/20180421/3b7d3e6e/attachment.html>