[GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discussion On Items ID 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, 152 & 155: Endorsing Non-Green Candidates For Statewide Office
Victoria Ashley
victronix01 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 12:58:13 PDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discussion On Items ID 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, 152 & 155: Endorsing Non-Green Candidates For Statewide Office
- Next message (by thread): [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discussion On Items ID 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, 152 & 155: Endorsing Non-Green Candidates For Statewide Office
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
“What Jesse is talking about is at the local level.”
What Jesse is really talking about is flexibility in group decision-making, regardless of level.
We cannot present our experiences at the state party level because currently we are not ALLOWED to consider the option.
— Victoria
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Nicole Castor <nmcastorsilva at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What Jesse is talking about is at the local level.
- Previous message (by thread): [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discussion On Items ID 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, 152 & 155: Endorsing Non-Green Candidates For Statewide Office
- Next message (by thread): [GPCA-SGA-Votes] Discussion On Items ID 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, 152 & 155: Endorsing Non-Green Candidates For Statewide Office
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the gpca-votes
mailing list