December 2007 - Sustainability

[Sustain] HEARING CANCELED! (Combustion Turbine Hearing)
by Eric Brooks 08 Dec '07

08 Dec '07

IMPORTANT: In true City Hall style, we have been informed by the Supervisors that the hearing on the JPower Combustion Turbine plant is now postponed until mid January. I'll keep you posted. Please pass the word. peace Eric Brooks 415-756-8844 previously I wrote: Hi again, Michela Alioto-Pier's hearing on alternatives to the JPower project looks like it will indeed be in the Land Use Committee this Monday, December 10, at 1pm, probably in City Hall Room 263. HOWEVER - This is not yet 100% confirmed so please just tell folks to be ready and that we will confirm by tomorrow (or Friday at the absolute latest). Previously I wrote: Hi all, Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier has just requested that Supervisor Maxwell hold a Land Use Committee hearing on alternatives to the JPower natural gas combustion turbine project. If Maxwell agrees, there will be a hearing this Monday, December 10 (probably beginning at 1pm in City Hall Room 263). If Maxwell refuses, the item will very likely be called before the full Board of Supervisors this Tuesday, December 11 in Room 250 (probably in the later afternoon). In either case, public comment will be allowed, and we need to be ready to turn out in huge numbers to say 'NO!' to the JPower natural gas power plant. It is also possible that by next week, one of our allies on the Board of Supervisors will introduce an alternative proposal to the JPower project. Regardless of whether there is an alternative on the table, we need to stand strong in the position that San Francisco doesn't need -any- more fossil fuel generation and that any alternative that -is- proposed must be held to -very- high standards; much higher than the SFPUC's and Cal ISO's weak standards for the JPower deal. So, exciting things are afoot. I'll let you know by the end of the week what is happening with hearings, and with alternatives to the JPower deal. peace Eric Brooks Our City SF Green Party -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara

2 1

[Sustain] Update: Hearing On Combustion Turbines Mon
by Eric Brooks 06 Dec '07

06 Dec '07

Hi again, Michela Alioto-Pier's hearing on alternatives to the JPower project looks like it will indeed be in the Land Use Committee this Monday, December 10, at 1pm, probably in City Hall Room 263. HOWEVER - This is not yet 100% confirmed so please just tell folks to be ready and that we will confirm by tomorrow (or Friday at the absolute latest). Previously I wrote: Hi all, Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier has just requested that Supervisor Maxwell hold a Land Use Committee hearing on alternatives to the JPower natural gas combustion turbine project. If Maxwell agrees, there will be a hearing this Monday, December 10 (probably beginning at 1pm in City Hall Room 263). If Maxwell refuses, the item will very likely be called before the full Board of Supervisors this Tuesday, December 11 in Room 250 (probably in the later afternoon). In either case, public comment will be allowed, and we need to be ready to turn out in huge numbers to say 'NO!' to the JPower natural gas power plant. It is also possible that by next week, one of our allies on the Board of Supervisors will introduce an alternative proposal to the JPower project. Regardless of whether there is an alternative on the table, we need to stand strong in the position that San Francisco doesn't need -any- more fossil fuel generation and that any alternative that -is- proposed must be held to -very- high standards; much higher than the SFPUC's and Cal ISO's weak standards for the JPower deal. So, exciting things are afoot. I'll let you know by the end of the week what is happening with hearings, and with alternatives to the JPower deal. peace Eric Brooks Our City SF Green Party -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara

1 0

[Sustain] Urgent! Hearing On Combustion Turbines Likely This Mon or Tue
by Eric Brooks 05 Dec '07

05 Dec '07

Hi all, Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier has just requested that Supervisor Maxwell hold a Land Use Committee hearing on alternatives to the JPower natural gas combustion turbine project. If Maxwell agrees, there will be a hearing this Monday, December 10 (probably beginning at 1pm in City Hall Room 263). If Maxwell refuses, the item will very likely be called before the full Board of Supervisors this Tuesday, December 11 in Room 250 (probably in the later afternoon). In either case, public comment will be allowed, and we need to be ready to turn out in huge numbers to say 'NO!' to the JPower natural gas power plant. It is also possible that by next week, one of our allies on the Board of Supervisors will introduce an alternative proposal to the JPower project. Regardless of whether there is an alternative on the table, we need to stand strong in the position that San Francisco doesn't need -any- more fossil fuel generation and that any alternative that -is- proposed must be held to -very- high standards; much higher than the SFPUC's and Cal ISO's weak standards for the JPower deal. So, exciting things are afoot. I'll let you know by the end of the week what is happening with hearings, and with alternatives to the JPower deal. peace Eric Brooks Our City SF Green Party -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara

2 1

[Sustain] Japan Preparing To Hunt Humpback Whales
by Eric Brooks 04 Dec '07

04 Dec '07

Hey all, Japan is planning to up its whale attacks and is outrageously planning to also hunt humpback whales this year. Please take a second to do an online action to help stop this at: http://usactions.greenpeace.org/action/start/170/ -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara

1 0

[Sustain] Mind Blowing Interview: Large Dams' High Green House Gas Emissions
by Eric Brooks 03 Dec '07

03 Dec '07

Hi all, There is an amazing 25 minute interview with the head of the International Rivers Network on dams' and water projects' massive destructive effects on the atmosphere, and on human land use sustainability at: http://tucradio.org/environment.html go to the fourth link from the top, or directly run in your audio player: http://tucradio.org/0110mccully.mp3 This interview makes crystal clear that energy policy has to be holistic and sensibly thought through, that dams are indeed bad for the environment, and that leaving them in place will in many cases -promote- global warming, and will accelerate already looming food depletion. dare I say cheers? Eric

1 0

Re: [Sustain] My Piece On Agro-fuels (& Tallow)
by Eric Brooks 01 Dec '07

01 Dec '07

I would be strongly opposed to that latter proposal for two reasons. 1) It could create a dependence and increase is developing energy from animal agriculture, and could greatly increase the public acceptance of animal agriculture by giving it a green cloak. It would likely even give a financial boost to animal agriculture because demand (and therefore price) for tallow for biodiesel plants might become greatly increased by skyrocketing petroleum prices. Animal agriculture is one of the most prolific generators of green house gasses; and also creates destruction of land and water quality in ways that further strongly deepen the climate crisis. So, it is crucial to steer strongly away from animal agriculture, and of course to concurrently get as many people to go vegetarian and vegan as possible to make a major multi-spectrum impact on the current planetary environmental collapse. 2) As a strong animal rights activist, I find it further, ethically and ecologically unacceptable to get energy from the killing of non-human animals. We went through this once already with whales (for their oil). Let's not repeat that scenario on land. By the way, another note on all of this that is never considered with both tallow and vegetable waste oil is that even these promote unnecessary consumer choices (for example eating deep fried foods) which we should be trying to steer consumers away from; both for public health reasons, and most importantly, because the extensive use of land to grow crops for oil and fat (which is then only thrown out after use) also creates massive green house gas emissions. These emissions are likely profound enough to make the supposed global warming mitigating impacts of reprocessing waste oils and fats non-existent. It is for this final reason that I am flatly opposed to all biofuels, even those from waste grease and oil. We could argue that at least tightly packed cities should make use of waste grease and oil to reduce health impacts from diesel pollutants. But it would be better to get rid of those impacts completely with electric transportation and construction systems. If we proceed with the SF biofuels program at all, we should narrowly target the use of that fuel to the worst emitters of diesel fumes, specifically, construction equipment; and make the program temporary, with the intention of phasing it out as actual renewable replacements come on line. peace Eric Brooks Cal Broomhead wrote: > But he is right, bio-diesel must be local and must truly be from waste > fats, oil, grease (FOG). Currently, the City's B20 does not meet that > standard, but I believe it will soon. There has been talk about the > Darling rendering plant (off 3rd St. in SF) providing as much as 4 > million gallons of B100. Currently, they make tallow for the cosmetic > and soap industries, which would lose the resource - not much of a > loss in my book. > > Cal Broomhead and Kathleen Ribeiro > broomhead(a)igc.org <mailto:broomhead@igc.org> > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Don Eichelberger <mailto:done7777@sbcglobal.net> > *To: *Eric Brooks <mailto:brookse32@aim.com> > *Cc: *GPCA-Energy(a)yahoogroups.com <mailto:GPCA-Energy@yahoogroups.com> > *Sent:* 11/28/2007 3:21:36 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Sustain] My Piece On Agro-fuels In Beyond Chron > > Eric- > > Great article, overall. Had some problem with some of the > rhetoric which left a vague sense of overstatement. I know it is > not an overstatement, and that is the rub. > > But expressions like, "blindly hooked on a devastating, diseased, > biofuels illusion...(a)nd unwitting starry eyed supporters of it > like Willie Nelson and E. "Doc" Smith are the keystone... writes a > smarmy smiling article...." > > are a bit of a turn-off to me, and i believe, to some of the > public, mostly those who do not want to hear the truth, anyway. > > But I can definitely relate to the frustration, and it is mostly a > great article. > > Definitely worth the read, > > Don > > At 08:26 AM 11/26/2007, you wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I got a good guest editorial spot for a piece I wrote strongly >> criticising biodiesel and the agro-fuels industry. >> >> See below or: >> http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/Guest_Editorial_The_Terrible_Illusion_o… >> >> >> >> *Guest Editorial: The Terrible Illusion of Biodiesel* >> >> >> >> /by Eric Brooks, 2007-11-26 >> /I read with shocked and tired eyes E. "Doc" Smith's recent >> glowing article >> <http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=5132> about San >> Francisco's biodiesel program. As an environmental activist with >> over two decades experience, every time I see an article like >> this, I lose another little bit of precious life and hope. >> >> Smith and others like him, trumpeting the valor of biodiesel and >> other biofuels, need to knock it off immediately. Biodiesel does >> -not- produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions than petroleum >> diesel, in fact it produces more. And the reality gets even worse >> than that. Biodiesel and other biofuels have suddenly become a >> huge booming industry which, because of the the nature of how >> those fuels are produced, is now destroying the planet and human >> civilization much faster than global warming. >> >> This needs to be repeated... The new biofuels boom is -worse- >> than global warming. And unwitting starry eyed supporters of it >> like Willie Nelson and E. "Doc" Smith are the keystone that is >> helping massive multi-national corporations get the planet's >> increasingly environmentally conscious public to become blindly >> hooked on a devastating, diseased, biofuels illusion. >> >> Those of us on the cutting edge of fighting the climate crisis >> have been struggling mightily to get people to wake up from this >> illusion for the last decade and we are beginning to get >> attention; but not nearly fast enough to stop corporations like >> ADM, Cargill, British Petroleum (BP), Monsanto, and many others >> from ramping up a massive explosion in biofuels, bioplastics, and >> biochemicals production which is already visibly and measurably >> increasing our already serious global environmental collapse at >> an almost exponential rate. >> >> The key problem of perception is french fry oil. When told of how >> some people are now running their cars on used vegetable oils >> that would have been thrown away, environmen tally conscious >> people immediately get very excited by the idea. I myself long >> ago, got very excited about it. But then I started thinking about >> all of the work that the environmental movement has done to fight >> corporate monoculture agriculture's devastating impact on the the >> planet. I started to crunch numbers in my head, and I immediately >> realized that biofuels could not possibly be a good thing, and >> that soon they would present the worst environmental disaster we >> have ever faced. That grim realization is now becoming a reality. >> >> The problem is one of sheer scale. The amount of fuel that can be >> produced from recycling used cooking oil is only a tiny fraction >> of the total fuel used every day by diesel automobiles. What this >> means is that projects like San Francisco's waste oils biodiesel >> program will quickly run out of those waste oils long before even >> a small part of San Francisco's fleet of diesel cars, trucks and >> construction equipment is converted to biodiesel. At that point >> there is only one place to get the supposedly magical biodiesel; >> from massive corporate plantations of monocrops grown >> specifically to produce biodiesel. >> >> In fact, because of European requirements for biofuel use, this >> is already happening. As you read this article, huge amounts of >> both rainforest, and food crop land, are being cleared in order >> to produce automobile fuel crops, most prominently, biodiesel >> from palm oil. The impact is already staggering and is getting >> worse very rapidly. And as rainforest and cropland are being >> destroyed, some grain food prices are skyrocketing both because >> food crops have been replaced by fuel crops and because many >> former food crops themselves are being used to produce fuel >> -instead- of food. >> >> This process is devastating the global ecosystem and economies in >> the global South; the latter which are already staggering under >> the terrible weight of a global agriculture industry that is >> eating up lands which once produced local food, in order to grow >> and sell to the world market, higher pri ced export crops. Take >> one look at the world's insane love of the automobile, and at the >> booming production of new automobiles for countries like China, >> and it is easy to see that biofuels are the -ultimate- export >> crop; which will form the foundation of a planet and civilization >> killing industry, if we allow their production to proceed any >> further. >> >> And as this cropland and rainforest clearing rages forward, the >> process, because it is accompanied by realities like top soil >> disturbance (which releases CO2) and the burning of undesirable >> trees and plant wastes, is creating massively higher CO2 releases >> than even petroleum products produce. For example, biodiesel made >> from palm oil produces -ten- times more global warming gasses >> than petroleum diesel. >> >> To complete the grim cycle, every time someone like Smith, >> however noble and well intentioned, writes a smarmy smiling >> article about how great and progressive biofuel is, the big ag >> companies go to Congresses and Parliaments all over the world >> with an even further gleefully deceived public as back-up, to get >> increased subsidies for this new devastating biofuels industry. >> >> And biofuel is just the beginning. These companies are now >> branching out into bioplastics, biochemicals, and >> biopharmaceuticals. Companies like BP (with its new 500 million >> dollar labs at UC Berkeley) are literally making plans to >> manufacture everything we produce now from petroleum and natural >> gas, from plant crops instead. The result of such nonsense is >> easily predictable - a much more rapid planetary collapse which >> will be completed in our own lifetimes. >> >> This insanity must be stopped immediately, and the first step is >> to stop painting glowing images of biofuels and start painting >> the accurate, Bosch like nightmare panorama, of biofuels as a >> disaster, which is now eating our planet alive, faster than >> global warming. >> >> To start getting a sense of the nature and scale of this problem, >> I recommend reading a couple of articles by science writer and >> environmental activist George Monbiot at, >> http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2005/12/06/worse-than-fossil-fuel/ >> and http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2007/03/27/a-lethal-solution/ >> / >> Eric Brooks is Co-Chair of the San Francisco Green Party >> Sustainability Working Group./ >> >> >> -- >> "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate >> themselves." -- Che >> Guevara >> _______________________________________________ >> Sustainability mailing list >> Sustainability(a)sfgreens.org >> https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainability > > > Don Eichelberger > DJ Fix Independent Productions > > Green Uprising Blog > www.greenuprising.blogspot.com > > <http://www.greenuprising.blogspot.com/>My You Tube > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctRp5rGJoUc > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iySwwyZfDgE > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r9rK8nPREA > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5UbnJ0kUqo > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SktIYTyC1U > > Donny Fix del.icio.us book marks > http://del.icio.us/donnyfix > > The Hegelian/Marxist goal is emancipation. Marx said it best in 1843: > > "Human emancipation wll only be complete when the real, individual > man (sic) is absorbed into himself the abstract citizen; when as > an individual man, in his every day life, in his work and in his > relationships, he has become a /species-being/ (*politically > accountabe to the whole*); and when he recognizes and realizes his > own power as /social/ powers, so that he no longer separates this > /socia/l power from himself as /political /power." > -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." -- Che Guevara

1 0