February 2011 - Sustainability

Re: [Sustain] [Transpo] participating in Transpo Plank update?
by Eric Brooks 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

I'd like to see us expand this to a full one or even two day weekend retreat to really flesh it out in a big way... On 2/27/2011 5:44 PM, John-Marc Chandonia wrote: > Hi, > > Who's interested in participating in the Transportation Plank > update? At our monthly meeting last week, Greens decided that there > are too many potential revisions to the plank to discuss, unless > they're first vetted by the working group. > > Although the Tranportation Working Group has been inactive for > some time, we're going to hold a special meeting for 2-3 hours in > order to hash out these proposals and come to consensus on what > changes to present at a future monthly meeting. > > If you're interested in participating in such a meeting, email me > (no need to copy the whole list) and say when you would prefer to meet > (give me days in the next month, either specific dates or general > guidance such as "avoid Fridays") and where (I'm thinking of a cafe > such as Tazo, but libraries would work also). Also, please be sure > you have time to read the current plank in advance of the meeting: > http://sfgreens.org/transpo14.txt > > JMC > > > _______________________________________________ > Transpo mailing list > Transpo(a)sfgreens.org > https://list.sfgreens.org/mailman/listinfo/transpo

1 0

[Sustain] Got To Promote The Party On 'Go Vegan Radio With Bob Linden' Again
by Eric Brooks 11 Feb '11

11 Feb '11

Hi all, Bob Linden interviewed me again on his radio show 'Go Vegan' and let me kick a little more Obama and Democrat butt, talk renewables transit, localization and anti-war, and also promote the Green Party. (Interestingly we had discovered that the Green Party U.S. has an awesome animal rights platform. To read it go to http://gp.org/platform/2004/ecology.html and page down to section J. 'Ethical Treatment of Animals') To listen to the show: - go to http://www.goveganradio.com/veg/1003/Listen_to_Past_Shows.htm - then page down slightly to the links for the '30 January 2011' - then click one of the audio format links - then fast forward the audio to the 32 min 45 sec mark You can also go directly to the high bandwidth program audio at: http://www.goveganradio.com:8484/shows/128kbps/go-vegan-with-bob-linden-201…

1 0

Re: [Sustain] [SFGP CC] Call For SFGP Support Of SF Urban Ag Legislation
by Bruce Wolfe 11 Feb '11

11 Feb '11

I know a lot about this and request we move slow on this considering the HANC Recycling Center. Alos, I know the lead person on this effort in the city, Kevin Bayuk, my next door neighbor. Bruce Sent from Samsung mobile Eric Brooks <brookse32(a)aim.com> wrote: >Hi all, > >See the email below from Casey Allen who would like the SF Green Party >to endorse new legislation supporting local urban agriculture in the >City. Casey also would like our support for three proposed amendments to >make the measure even stronger. > >Please read below and voice any concerns/support. The measure goes >before the Planning Commission on Thursday Feb 17th, so we need to >approve this before then. > >CC members, can you decide after folks comment? > >Also, I may not be able to attend that Planning Commission hearing when >that item comes up around 1:30pm, so if one of you is a strong supporter >of local urban ag, can you commit to speak on behalf of SF Green Party? > >The legislation text can be found at >http://www.sfuaa.org/uploads/4/8/9/3/4893022/_sf_urban_agriculture_zoning_p… > >Here is Casey's email: > >I hope the new year is going well. As you know I own and run a >landscaping company and we grow food for some folk. My company is part >of a national trend, urban agriculture. I and others are really happy >to see that the planning dept has released a proposed change to the >city’s zoning to allow commercial small scale farming. We think this is >great and this will allow us to sell the food we are growing and this is >a big improvement. I am part of a group called the San Francisco Urban >Agriculture Alliance and we have recently come together to promote >commercial agriculture as well as non-commercial agriculture in SF. I >would like to start a conversation with the Green Partyand yourself >about how we may be able to improve on this great proposaland to see if >the Green Partycould support us in asking the city for a better policy. >Here is the link to review thecity’s proposal: > >http://www.sfgsa.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=7437 > >Check out the SFUAA’s website info page: >http://www.sfuaa.org/urban-ag-zoning-proposal.html > >Here is a write up/press release of the group’s concerns:** > >*Urban Agriculture Alliance Applauds Introduction of Proposed Urban >Agriculture Zoning Changes * > >/New regulations would open more land to community gardens and / > >/help city farms be economically viable, but amendments are needed / > > >San Francisco, CA – Yesterday, Mayor Gavin Newsom and the San Francisco >Planning Department introduced an ordinance that would amend the >Planning Code to allow for greater food production within the city. The >proposal would update San Francisco’s zoning regulations to explicitly >permit gardens in all areas of the city and also allow for the sale of >produce from those gardens. While the San Francisco Urban Agriculture >Alliance applauds the Mayor and Planning Department for introducing this >forward-thinking legislation, the group is concerned about a number of >provisions that could make garden projects prohibitively expensive and >limit their potential. > >“The Planning Department’s proposal is a great step forward, but some of >the draft provisions could hinder the expansion of gardening that the >City wants to encourage,” said Eli Zigas, co-coordinator of the San >Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance (SFUAA). “Community gardens and >urban farms operate on slim budgets and expensive fencing requirements >and permitting fees can prevent a garden project from breaking ground. >We encourage the Planning Commission to ensure that community groups and >city farmers across San Francisco can afford to start gardens and urban >agriculture projects in their neighborhoods.” > >Advocates are specifically calling on the Planning Commission to amend >the proposed ordinance to reduce its costs. The proposal requires that >any fencing around a garden site must be either wooden or ornamental >fencing. The addition of significant start-up costs to meet this >requirement could deter a project from turning a vacant lot into a >vibrant new greenspace or a project that would provide a source of >fresh, nutritious food in a neighborhood lacking access to good produce >options. Similarly, the Planning Department’s existing “change of use” >fee structure would require urban agriculture projects to pay more than >$300 before they could begin any work. The SFUAA encourages the Planning >Commission to remove any mention of a fencing requirement and waive the >change of use fees for urban agriculture. > >With this legislation, San Francisco will be the first major American >city to modify its zoning to encourage the sale of produce from urban >gardens and farms. Similar legislation to allow for on-site sales of >city-grown produce became law this year in both Seattle and Kansas City >and a proposal is currently being considered in Berkeley. > >For city farmers starting small businesses, being able to sell what you >grow is critical. Little City Gardens, which cultivates a three-quarter >acre garden in the Mission Terrace neighborhood, cannot sell any of the >greens or herbs it grows because of restrictions in the current zoning >code. “This proposal is crucial for the success of commercial urban >farming in San Francisco,” said Little City Garden’s co-owner Caitlyn >Galloway. “We want to demonstrate the viability of market gardening here >in San Francisco, but we can’t do that until we’re allowed to sell what >we grow. And we can’t sell from our farm until this proposal passes.” > >For San Francisco to truly position itself at the leading edge of urban >agriculture, the SFUAA urges the Planning Commission to amend the >proposal to allow gardens and farms to pool together their harvest and >also allow them to sell value-added products made from their produce. > >“As it’s written now, the proposal would allow an urban farmer to sell >their strawberries on the farm, but not their strawberry jam,” Zigas >explained. “Expanding the proposal to allow for on-site sales of >value-added products as well as produce from multiple sites would help >small urban farms make the most of their harvest and make San >Francisco’s policy an innovative model for the rest of the country.” > >The positive impact of the proposal would stretch beyond creating new >greenspace and supporting new urban farming businesses. “This zoning >legislation is crucial for the health of San Francisco. Urban farming >and community gardens not only provide residents with access to healthy >non-toxic produce, but they help engage people in personal nutrition and >can improve the health of the entire community. It’s easy for people to >become removed from our food sources and those who produce our food," >said Dana Perls, community organizer with Pesticide Watch. "This >proposal offers San Franciscans more spaces to produce their own food. >With the SFUAA’s proposed amendments, the new zoning code will be an >investment in healthy communities.” > >### > >/The San Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance (SFUAA) seeks to increase >the amount of food grown within San Francisco and promote greater access >to and consumption of that food through advocacy, education, and >grassroots action. We pursue our mission by leveraging the strengths of >our members, building bonds with other organizations and government >agencies, and promoting healthy food cultures. / > >/More information on the San Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance can be >found at: www.sfuaa.org <http://www.sfuaa.org> / > >Let me know if there is a good time we can talk. I would like to set up >a meeting, if possible.I don’t think anyone from our group has >approached the Green Party yet. > >Thanks, > >*Casey Allen*, Permaculture Designer, Maintenance Manager > >Qualified Bay-Friendly Design Professional, SF Naturalist > >*San Francisco Landscapes Corporation* CA Lic # 932022 > >P.O. Box 170182 SF, CA 94117 > >Cell: 415-572-1144 > >Office: 415-585-9137 > >E-mail: Casey(a)SFLandscapes.com > >Web: SFLandscapes.com > > >_______________________________________________ >San Francisco Green Party CC mailing list >CC(a)sfgreens.org To unsubscribe or change options, go here: >https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cc

3 2

[Sustain] Call For SFGP Support Of SF Urban Ag Legislation
by Eric Brooks 09 Feb '11

09 Feb '11

Hi all, See the email below from Casey Allen who would like the SF Green Party to endorse new legislation supporting local urban agriculture in the City. Casey also would like our support for three proposed amendments to make the measure even stronger. Please read below and voice any concerns/support. The measure goes before the Planning Commission on Thursday Feb 17th, so we need to approve this before then. CC members, can you decide after folks comment? Also, I may not be able to attend that Planning Commission hearing when that item comes up around 1:30pm, so if one of you is a strong supporter of local urban ag, can you commit to speak on behalf of SF Green Party? The legislation text can be found at http://www.sfuaa.org/uploads/4/8/9/3/4893022/_sf_urban_agriculture_zoning_p… Here is Casey's email: I hope the new year is going well. As you know I own and run a landscaping company and we grow food for some folk. My company is part of a national trend, urban agriculture. I and others are really happy to see that the planning dept has released a proposed change to the city’s zoning to allow commercial small scale farming. We think this is great and this will allow us to sell the food we are growing and this is a big improvement. I am part of a group called the San Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance and we have recently come together to promote commercial agriculture as well as non-commercial agriculture in SF. I would like to start a conversation with the Green Partyand yourself about how we may be able to improve on this great proposaland to see if the Green Partycould support us in asking the city for a better policy. Here is the link to review thecity’s proposal: http://www.sfgsa.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=7437 Check out the SFUAA’s website info page: http://www.sfuaa.org/urban-ag-zoning-proposal.html Here is a write up/press release of the group’s concerns:** *Urban Agriculture Alliance Applauds Introduction of Proposed Urban Agriculture Zoning Changes * /New regulations would open more land to community gardens and / /help city farms be economically viable, but amendments are needed / San Francisco, CA – Yesterday, Mayor Gavin Newsom and the San Francisco Planning Department introduced an ordinance that would amend the Planning Code to allow for greater food production within the city. The proposal would update San Francisco’s zoning regulations to explicitly permit gardens in all areas of the city and also allow for the sale of produce from those gardens. While the San Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance applauds the Mayor and Planning Department for introducing this forward-thinking legislation, the group is concerned about a number of provisions that could make garden projects prohibitively expensive and limit their potential. “The Planning Department’s proposal is a great step forward, but some of the draft provisions could hinder the expansion of gardening that the City wants to encourage,” said Eli Zigas, co-coordinator of the San Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance (SFUAA). “Community gardens and urban farms operate on slim budgets and expensive fencing requirements and permitting fees can prevent a garden project from breaking ground. We encourage the Planning Commission to ensure that community groups and city farmers across San Francisco can afford to start gardens and urban agriculture projects in their neighborhoods.” Advocates are specifically calling on the Planning Commission to amend the proposed ordinance to reduce its costs. The proposal requires that any fencing around a garden site must be either wooden or ornamental fencing. The addition of significant start-up costs to meet this requirement could deter a project from turning a vacant lot into a vibrant new greenspace or a project that would provide a source of fresh, nutritious food in a neighborhood lacking access to good produce options. Similarly, the Planning Department’s existing “change of use” fee structure would require urban agriculture projects to pay more than $300 before they could begin any work. The SFUAA encourages the Planning Commission to remove any mention of a fencing requirement and waive the change of use fees for urban agriculture. With this legislation, San Francisco will be the first major American city to modify its zoning to encourage the sale of produce from urban gardens and farms. Similar legislation to allow for on-site sales of city-grown produce became law this year in both Seattle and Kansas City and a proposal is currently being considered in Berkeley. For city farmers starting small businesses, being able to sell what you grow is critical. Little City Gardens, which cultivates a three-quarter acre garden in the Mission Terrace neighborhood, cannot sell any of the greens or herbs it grows because of restrictions in the current zoning code. “This proposal is crucial for the success of commercial urban farming in San Francisco,” said Little City Garden’s co-owner Caitlyn Galloway. “We want to demonstrate the viability of market gardening here in San Francisco, but we can’t do that until we’re allowed to sell what we grow. And we can’t sell from our farm until this proposal passes.” For San Francisco to truly position itself at the leading edge of urban agriculture, the SFUAA urges the Planning Commission to amend the proposal to allow gardens and farms to pool together their harvest and also allow them to sell value-added products made from their produce. “As it’s written now, the proposal would allow an urban farmer to sell their strawberries on the farm, but not their strawberry jam,” Zigas explained. “Expanding the proposal to allow for on-site sales of value-added products as well as produce from multiple sites would help small urban farms make the most of their harvest and make San Francisco’s policy an innovative model for the rest of the country.” The positive impact of the proposal would stretch beyond creating new greenspace and supporting new urban farming businesses. “This zoning legislation is crucial for the health of San Francisco. Urban farming and community gardens not only provide residents with access to healthy non-toxic produce, but they help engage people in personal nutrition and can improve the health of the entire community. It’s easy for people to become removed from our food sources and those who produce our food," said Dana Perls, community organizer with Pesticide Watch. "This proposal offers San Franciscans more spaces to produce their own food. With the SFUAA’s proposed amendments, the new zoning code will be an investment in healthy communities.” ### /The San Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance (SFUAA) seeks to increase the amount of food grown within San Francisco and promote greater access to and consumption of that food through advocacy, education, and grassroots action. We pursue our mission by leveraging the strengths of our members, building bonds with other organizations and government agencies, and promoting healthy food cultures. / /More information on the San Francisco Urban Agriculture Alliance can be found at: www.sfuaa.org <http://www.sfuaa.org> / Let me know if there is a good time we can talk. I would like to set up a meeting, if possible.I don’t think anyone from our group has approached the Green Party yet. Thanks, *Casey Allen*, Permaculture Designer, Maintenance Manager Qualified Bay-Friendly Design Professional, SF Naturalist *San Francisco Landscapes Corporation* CA Lic # 932022 P.O. Box 170182 SF, CA 94117 Cell: 415-572-1144 Office: 415-585-9137 E-mail: Casey(a)SFLandscapes.com Web: SFLandscapes.com

1 0

[Sustain] SF Transit Survey For Transportation Plan
by Eric Brooks 03 Feb '11

03 Feb '11

San Francisco is in the process of updating the San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP), which will identify goals, needs and investment priorities for the city's transportation system for the next 25 years. The SF Transportation Authority has created an online survey to get input for the project: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/sftp The web site for the Transportation Plan is http://www.sfcta.org/content/view/822/416

2 1