March 2013 - Sustainability - list.sfgreens.org

Re: [Sustain] [SFGP-A] VERY TIME SENSITIVE: Add Your Member Groups To Sign-On To Oppose Wiener-CEQA Legislation
by Eric Brooks 30 Mar '13

30 Mar '13

Yes. The SF Greens already oppose the Wiener legislation. I sent this to our lists so that Greens who are members of -other- groups can get them to sign on. cheers Eric B On 3/30/2013 11:59 AM, yolanda catzalco wrote: > Eric, I thought we agreed at the meeting you would. > Yolanda > > Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:43:00 -0700 > From: brookse32(a)aim.com > To: active(a)sfgreens.org; sustainability(a)sfgreens.org; transpo(a)sfgreens.org > Subject: [SFGP-A] VERY TIME SENSITIVE: Add Your Member Groups To Sign-On > To Oppose Wiener-CEQA Legislation > > Hi all, > > We have just heard through the grapevine that Supervisor Wiener may try > for a vote in the Land Use Committee for his CEQA legislation on April 8 > (instead of April 15) with a likely vote on April 9 at the full Board of > Supervisors. > > Because of this accelerated time line, it is vital that we quickly > generate an official sign-on letter opposing supervisor Wiener's CEQA > legislation so that we will have enough leverage to delay it until the > Jane Kim Community Alternative can come forward for consideration. > > The SF Green Party has already consensed to oppose the Wiener CEQA > legislation, however many of you are affiliated with other groups that > we also need to add in official opposition. > > See the sign-on letter attached as SF_CEQA_Sign-On_3-29-13 > > PLEASE REPLY BY APRIL 7 WITH YOUR GROUP'S ENDORSEMENT OF THE LETTER > > Also see attached for reference, 'CCIT_Fact_Sheet_on_Wiener_CEQA > Legislation' the most recent critique of Wiener's legislation from our > Community CEQA Improvement Team. > > Again, please reply by April 7 with your group's endorsement of this letter. > > My cell number is below, so feel free to call with any questions. > > thanks, > > Eric Brooks - 415-756-8844 > Campaign Coordinator, Our City > Coordinator, Community CEQA Improvement Team > > > _______________________________________________ San Francisco Green > Party Active Members List To unsubscribe or edit your options, go here: > https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/active -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." Che Guevara

1 0

[Sustain] VERY TIME SENSITIVE: Add Your Member Groups To Sign-On To Oppose Wiener-CEQA Legislation
by Eric Brooks 30 Mar '13

30 Mar '13

Hi all, We have just heard through the grapevine that Supervisor Wiener may try for a vote in the Land Use Committee for his CEQA legislation on April 8 (instead of April 15) with a likely vote on April 9 at the full Board of Supervisors. Because of this accelerated time line, it is vital that we quickly generate an official sign-on letter opposing supervisor Wiener's CEQA legislation so that we will have enough leverage to delay it until the Jane Kim Community Alternative can come forward for consideration. The SF Green Party has already consensed to oppose the Wiener CEQA legislation, however many of you are affiliated with other groups that we also need to add in official opposition. See the sign-on letter attached as SF_CEQA_Sign-On_3-29-13 PLEASE REPLY BY APRIL 7 WITH YOUR GROUP'S ENDORSEMENT OF THE LETTER Also see attached for reference, 'CCIT_Fact_Sheet_on_Wiener_CEQA Legislation' the most recent critique of Wiener's legislation from our Community CEQA Improvement Team. Again, please reply by April 7 with your group's endorsement of this letter. My cell number is below, so feel free to call with any questions. thanks, Eric Brooks - 415-756-8844 Campaign Coordinator, Our City Coordinator, Community CEQA Improvement Team

1 0

[Sustain] VERY IMPORTANT: Wiener-CEQA STRATEGY MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING, Thu, Mar 14, 11AM & NOON - SF City Hall Cafe and Room 400
by Eric Brooks 10 Mar '13

10 Mar '13

Hi all, We have both a crucial Planning Commission hearing on Scott Wiener's legislation attacking the the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and a pre-hearing STRATEGY MEETING beforehand, coming up this Thursday in City Hall beginning at 11am. It is vital that we establish to the Planning Commission that Supervisor Wiener was absolutely unresponsive to their recommendation that he work with community stakeholders to improve his CEQA legislation. (NOTE: The Planning agenda items being heard in front of the Wiener-CEQA measure should go fairly quickly so show up on time. See talking points for public comment further below and attached. Please reply right away to brookse32(a)earthlink.net to confirm that you plan to attend either or both meetings.) NEXT CEQA STRATEGY MEETING: - Thursday, March 14, SF City Hall Basement Cafe, 11am - To discuss public comment strategy for Noon Planning Commission CEQA hearing THEN - PLANNING COMMISSION: on project deadlines & Wiener CEQA measure - Thursday, March 14, SF City Hall Room 400, 12 noon - NOTE: Two Items #8 and #12 Details & Talking Points: - Item 8, COMMISSION POLICY ON TIMING OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION Two resolutions which extend the start deadlines for many developer projects to 6 years (instead of 3) and allow the Planning Dept. Zoning Administrator to unilaterally extend such deadlines indefinitely! See details at: http://commissions.sfplanning.org/cpcpackets/Commission_Packet-Policy_on_Pr… - Item 12, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PROCEDURES (WIENER) Draft 3 of Supervisor Scott Wiener's CEQA measure; which still contains no significant amendments whatsoever in response to our concerns. **TALKING POINTS FOR THE HEARING** (also attached as pdf) ON ITEM 8, PROJECT TIMING These rule changes should not be considered until the proposed amendments to CEQA procedures are decided upon, -especially- where the rule changes would allow deadline extensions due to CEQA appeals. The rule changes themselves would give developers excessive leeway to delay, and leave important land and buildings idle much too long, with the selfish intention of increasing profits by waiting for property values to increase. And they would give FAR too much power to the Zoning Administrator to extend such delays indefinitely. ON ITEM 12, WIENER CEQA PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS (3 points) 1) On November, 29, 2012, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended to Supervisor Wiener that he meet with the many community opponents to the first and second drafts of his CEQA legislation, and to then introduce an AMENDED text which reflects feedback from these community organizations. 2) Supervisor Wiener was then highly selective in notices he sent to community representatives, leaving most of us uninformed that the meetings were taking place. Community representatives were forced to find out about the Supervisor's so-called 'roundtable discussions' third hand, and then send out our own notices to others and alert them to these important meetings. 3) After three so-called 'roundtable discussions' with Supervisor Wiener, Planning Staff, and City Attorney Elaine Warren, no substantial changes AT ALL have been made in this legislation to address the many serious problems that we have clearly documented both to them and to the Planning Commission. We therefore call on the Commission to recommend a 'NO' vote on Supervisor Wiener's legislation to the Board of Supervisors. Community requirements which have still not been met are: (Bring and refer to the longer attached 'Talking Points For March 14 Planning Hearing On CEQA' to read one or two specific requirements that Supervisor Wiener has failed to meet.) This is a big one all! Let's put Supervisor Wiener on public notice for his failure to work with us! Again, please reply right away to brookse32(a)earthlink.net to confirm that you plan to attend either or both meetings. peace Eric Brooks Campaign Coordinator, Our City 415-756-8844

1 0

[Sustain] Fwd: FW: BREAKING NEWS: SAN ONOFRE: Secret report confirms Edison knew of major problems with steam generator design
by Don Eichelberger 09 Mar '13

09 Mar '13

Here is some important, breaking information on San Onofre showing they put expediency over safety- something whistle blowers have been witnessing for years, but this time they got caught. Now, if we can make it stick, and stick it to those responsible for their own cost overruns. Another nail, Don -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FW: BREAKING NEWS: SAN ONOFRE: Secret report confirms Edison knew of major problems with steam generator design Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:27:38 +0000 From: Ulrich, Kendra <KUlrich(a)foe.org> To: CC: Dear All, The long awaited MHI report has been publicly released. And yes, it is as incendiary as Boxer and Markey had indicated. Please see our press release below, and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Best, Kendra *From:*Bill Walker *Sent:*Friday, March 08, 2013 3:18 PM *Subject:* BREAKING NEWS: SAN ONOFRE: Secret report confirms Edison knew of major problems with steam generator design *FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 8, 2013* *CONTACT: Bill Walker, (510) 759-9911 <tel:%28510%29%20759-9911>; Damon Moglen (202) 352-4223 <tel:%28202%29%20352-4223>* ** *SAN ONOFRE: Secret report confirms Edison knew of major problems * /Friends of the Earth: 'Bombshell' for plans to restart crippled reactor / // *WASHINGTON, March 8 --*A secret Mitsubishi Heavy Industries report released today confirms that Southern California Edison knew about serious problems in the radically redesigned replacement steam generators for the San Onofre nuclear reactors years before the defective equipment was installed, yet failed to make changes to fix the problems. The report was released today by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission after Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Representative Edward Markey (D-Mass.) revealed its existence and demanded it be made public. The report documents that Edison knew of specific safety concerns with the replacement steam generator design as early as 2005, and failed to incorporate changes proposed to fix it because they would trigger a more lengthy and public review by the NRC. It fatally undermines Edison's case for restarting one of the plant's crippled reactors and for receiving any compensation from the California Public Utility Commission. "This is a bombshell," said Damon Moglen, energy and climate director for Friends of the Earth. "Edison clearly knew about design problems with the San Onofre replacement steam generators yet failed to take corrective action. Instead Edison gambled with the safety of millions of Southern Californians. It is inconceivable that the NRC would now give approval to restart these damaged reactors without the thorough, public review of a license amendment proceeding." David Freeman, former head of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and a senior advisor to Friends of the Earth, said the Mitsubishi report could prove pivotal with the California Public Utility Commission, which is considering whether Edison can pass on to its customers the $671 million cost of the faulty generators, plus the cost of repairs and replacement power during the plant's shutdown, now in its 14^th month. Said Freeman: "It's clear that ratepayers in Southern California can not be expected to pay for Edison's defective equipment if Edison acted imprudently. At nuclear reactors, prioritizing construction speed over safety is the height of imprudence." Since Sen. Boxer and Rep. Markey revealed the existence of the report, Friends of the Earth has demanded that the NRC Petition Review Board consider it in proceedings currently underway. The Petition Review Board, in response to a petition from Friends of the Earth, is determining whether Edison improperly failed to apply for a license amendment before installing replacement steam generators of a radically different design than was permitted under the reactors' operating license. Nuclear engineers Arnie Gunderson of Burlington, Vt., and John Large of London, consultants to Friends of the Earth, are reviewing the Mitsubishi report and will provide expert analysis. # # # Click here for the MHI document <http://libcloud.s3.amazonaws.com/93/92/5/2795/MHI_Root_Cause.pdf>. Click here for Friends of the Earth's annotation of selected quotes from the MHI report and related documents. <http://www.foe.org/news/blog/2013-03-san-onofre-quotes-and-conclusions%20%20> Click here for the Friends of the Earth petitions case <http://www.fairewinds.org/sites/fairewinds.org/files/reports/2013-1-16_foe_…>. *Bill Walker dba Deadline Now Berkeley CA (510) 759-9911 <tel:%28510%29%20759-9911> bw.deadline(a)gmail.com <mailto:bw.deadline@gmail.com> Twitter: @deadlinenow Skype: deadlinenow*

1 0