April 2008 - Sustainability - list.sfgreens.org

Re: [Sustain] CO2 Cap & Trade?
by Eric Brooks 21 Jul '08

21 Jul '08

Well, the idea is that you put a top limit or 'cap' on how much each county/state/corporations can emit. Concurrently with that, you create a market for trading reductions in CO2 emissions such that corporations get 'credits' (which are worth real money) and sometimes (but not always) corporations receive financial penalties or taxes for exceeding limits. The idea is that you make reducing CO2 emissions desirable by making it valuable. Then, you set up a market in which the CO2 credits get turned into electronic trading notes (a lot like stocks). So, one company, say, a carpet maker, figures out ways to greatly reduce it emissions, and its trading exchange issues that company a given amount of credits for free. Then, another company, say, a cement manufacturer, knowing that it is going to exceed its limits, buys the credits created by the carpet company so that, on paper, the cement company has bought enough credits to -not- exceed its limits; and so, it can therefore avoid emissions penalties (if there are any) or the cost of installing pollution controls (if their state requires any). Depending on the current or future cost of pollution control requirements, and taxes and penalties on fuel use or CO2 production, some companies may see the credits as even more valuable and pay more for them than their set value, and this makes the credits rise in value on the trading 'floor'. Now, as we all know, from any quick glance at the stock market, and especially at markets trading currency values, speculators over the last many decades have developed incredibly clever and complex ways of making money from trading even though they aren't creating any value or production whatsoever. Add this to the fact that corporations have high incentives to use tricks to pretend on paper that they are reducing their emissions when they are not, that corporations will continue to get laws passed to reduce pollution controls and penalties and even to change the way CO2 trading systems work, and it is easy to see that such cap and trade systems are doomed to failure. Indeed, the cap and trade system adopted a few years ago in Europe is already failing dismally. See http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=21202 cheers Eric Anne Garrison wrote: I can't even figure out how this cap and trade business is supposed to work. Somebody told me that carbon offsetting meant something fairly simple like paying to plant a tree in exchange for some sort of excess energy use, but I can't even tell how this is supposed to work. If I'm around and anyone can enlighten me at the next meeting, I'd appreciate it. I know it's crap, and don't much feel like sorting it out, but feel like I should.

3 2

[Sustain] Very Important: All: Need 2 More Oks Ok For Anti-Power Plant Rally Sponsorship
by Eric Brooks 30 Apr '08

30 Apr '08

I need two more thumbs up for SFGP to be able to be listed as a rally sponsor on the anti-power plant action alerted below. So far I have me, Marc, Vicki, Paul Platt, Chin Chi and Pat Gerber step up peace Eric Hi all, On Monday, May 5th there will be a big rally to oppose the construction of a new polluting natural gas Combustion Turbine power plant in the Bayview Hunters Point. This is the same combustion turbine plant that the General Membership decided officially to oppose a few months ago. The plant contract will be before the Government Audits and Oversight Committee on May 5th, so this is our final chance to turn out big opposition to the plant. See the attached letter opposing the plant for the basic message. I've signed my name on behalf of the Party because the letter is very consistent with our previous decision as a whole, and I've been the lead spokesperson in hearings on the issue. Please give thumbs ups right away so that we can also make SFGP an official sponsor of the rally. thanks peace Eric -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara

1 0

[Sustain] Article from Common Dreams NewsCenter
by Don EIchelberger 29 Apr '08

29 Apr '08

Hello, Don EIchelberger wanted to share this article with you: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/25/8522/ Message: More on peak oil. Word is getting out. Thanks! ______________________________________ Common Dreams Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community www.commondreams.org ________________________________________________________ Referral service by ReferralBlast.com

1 0

Re: [Sustain] [SFGP-A] Join Vital Rally To Stop Polluting Power Plants In SF! Next Mon, May 5, 9-10am, SF City Hall (Polk St. Steps)
by pamndave＠speakeasy.net 29 Apr '08

29 Apr '08

I second Rita's remarks. Eric: Thank you for being out there on the front lines & for alerting the rest of us to what's important. David On Mon Apr 28 14:29 , Rita Goldberger sent: >Hi Eric, This email prompted me to tell you what I've been thinking some time, which is to thank you for keeping us current with San Francisco political activity. I am so busy with my work and church that I don't often have time to attend these events, but I am so grateful that you, and a handful of others, keep us posted. We're going to start building an infrastructure in the Sunset to respond to this kind of activity, and we will depend on you, and others like you, to warn us when we need to activate it. Rita Goldberger Rita Goldberger > >Eric Brooks <brookse32(a)aim.com> wrote: Hi all, > >This is an urgent moment in San Francisco and > world history. > >Though nearly every major environmental and social justice group has voiced strong opposition to the building of new fossil fuel power plants in San Francisco, next Monday, May 5th, our Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) will outrageously seek permission to build a polluting natural gas power plant in San Francisco within the next year. Worse still, if approved, this plant will be built in our most environmentally damaged and vulnerable neighborhood, the Bayview Hunters Point. Meanwhile, new reports surface nearly every week that the Global Warming crisis is becoming much more serious, much more rapidly than previously believed, and our entire planet is in danger. > >Unfortunately, Mayor Gavin Newsom and our Board of Supervisors are wavering, and have still not come out in majority opposition to this disastrous power plant! This means that the plant construction could be approved as early as next week. > >It is absolutely critical that we > turn out in huge numbers on the City Hall Polk Street steps next Monday May 5, from 9-10am, to show the Mayor and Board of Supervisors that San Franciscans will not tolerate further inaction, and that we demand that this unacceptable power plant project be stopped immediately. We must send a message to the world that San Francisco has decided to lead the planet to a clean energy future by permanently halting all plans to build fossil fuel power plants. > >COME TO THE RALLY! > >WHERE: San Francisco City Hall, Polk Street steps, (from Civic Center BART/MUNI at 8th and Market, cross United Nations Plaza to the City Hall steps) > >WHEN: Monday, May 5, 9-10am > >WHO: Join Our City, Sierra Club, The Ella Baker Center For Human Rights, Greenaction, The San Francisco Green Party, Brightline Defense, EDF, SPUR, The San Francisco Bayview, and many other groups, to demand an end to fossil fuel plants in San Francisco. > >BRING SIGNS!: If you can take a moment, > also make your own sign that expresses how you feel about this alarming power plant project and its potentially terrible impact on our community and the world. > >BRING FRIENDS!: Bring everyone you know who cares about the future of San Francisco and the planet! > >ATTEND THE HEARING: Directly following the rally, a City Hall committee will likely vote on the power plant contract. Join other ralliers to attend this hearing and voice your opinion to the Board of Supervisors. (The hearing location and agenda will be announced at the end of the rally.) > >For more information, see http://our-city.org/campaigns/index.html > >Thanks for your action and support! > >Eric Brooks >Campaign Coordinator >Our City >This alert sent by: Our City 1028-A Howard St. San Francisco, CA 94103 415-756-8844 For more information about > Our City campaigns go to: http://www.our-city.org info@our- city.org >-- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." Che Guevara_______________________________________________ >San Francisco Green Party Active Members List >To unsubscribe or edit your options, go here: >https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/active >

2 1

[Sustain] Join Vital Rally To Stop Polluting Power Plants In SF! Next Mon, May 5, 9-10am, SF City Hall (Polk St. Steps)
by Eric Brooks 28 Apr '08

28 Apr '08

Hi all, This is an urgent moment in San Francisco and world history. Though nearly every major environmental and social justice group has voiced strong opposition to the building of new fossil fuel power plants in San Francisco, next Monday, May 5th, our Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) will outrageously seek permission to build a polluting natural gas power plant in San Francisco within the next year. Worse still, if approved, this plant will be built in our most environmentally damaged and vulnerable neighborhood, the Bayview Hunters Point. Meanwhile, new reports surface nearly every week that the Global Warming crisis is becoming much more serious, much more rapidly than previously believed, and our entire planet is in danger. Unfortunately, Mayor Gavin Newsom and our Board of Supervisors are wavering, and have still not come out in majority opposition to this disastrous power plant! This means that the plant construction could be approved as early as next week. It is absolutely critical that we turn out in huge numbers on the City Hall Polk Street steps next Monday May 5, from 9-10am, to show the Mayor and Board of Supervisors that San Franciscans will not tolerate further inaction, and that we demand that this unacceptable power plant project be stopped immediately. We must send a message to the world that San Francisco has decided to lead the planet to a clean energy future by permanently halting all plans to build fossil fuel power plants. COME TO THE RALLY! WHERE: San Francisco City Hall, Polk Street steps, (from Civic Center BART/MUNI at 8th and Market, cross United Nations Plaza to the City Hall steps) WHEN: Monday, May 5, 9-10am WHO: Join Our City, Sierra Club, The Ella Baker Center For Human Rights, Greenaction, The San Francisco Green Party, Brightline Defense, EDF, SPUR, The San Francisco Bayview, and many other groups, to demand an end to fossil fuel plants in San Francisco. BRING SIGNS!: If you can take a moment, also make your own sign that expresses how you feel about this alarming power plant project and its potentially terrible impact on our community and the world. BRING FRIENDS!: Bring everyone you know who cares about the future of San Francisco and the planet! ATTEND THE HEARING: Directly following the rally, a City Hall committee will likely vote on the power plant contract. Join other ralliers to attend this hearing and voice your opinion to the Board of Supervisors. (The hearing location and agenda will be announced at the end of the rally.) For more information, see http://our-city.org/campaigns/index.html Thanks for your action and support! Eric Brooks Campaign Coordinator Our City ////This alert sent by://// //Our City 1028-A Howard St. San Francisco, CA 94103 415-756-8844 For more information about Our City campaigns go to: http://www.our-city.org info(a)our-city.org <mailto:info@our-city.org>// -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." -- Che Guevara

2 1

[Sustain] Reminder: Joint Meeting: Transportation & Sustainability - Tonight, Thu, Apr 24, 6:30-9pm, SFGP Office
by Eric Brooks 24 Apr '08

24 Apr '08

Joint Meeting: Transportation & Sustainability Working Groups When: Thursday, 4/24/08, 6:30PM-9:00PM Where: SFGP Office, 1028A Howard St NOTE: This will be a very important meeting because the final committee hearing on the polluting Combustion Turbine power plant proposal for the Bayview Hunters Point will be held at City Hall within 2 weeks, and we need to organize to attend that hearing in big numbers to demand a halt to the power plant project. Proposed Agenda Items - Assessing The Transit Effectiveness Project - McGoldrick's Elected MTA Charter Amendment - Peak Oil Taskforce Update - Critical Combustion Turbine Update - Update On Mayor's Solar Programs and New Sandoval Solar Proposal - Update On Community Choice Energy project

1 0

[Sustain] PG&E Sponsored Fundraiser For Mayor's Solar Supporters
by Eric Brooks 22 Apr '08

22 Apr '08

Hey all, Vote Solar just proudly announced its successful fundraising event 'Equinox 2' in which, among its major donors, were PG&E (top donor), Edison, Chevron and BP. see http://www.votesolar.org/equinox2/thank_you/ and also the previous year's Equinox fundraiser at http://www.votesolar.org/equinox/thank_you/ Vote Solar is the organization (founded by now SFPUC Commissioner David Hochschild) which also put forward the poorly written solar Prop B in 2001 for 50 mw of solar on City facilities. Prop B passed, but failed to implement because of its poor funding plan combined with the fact that the SFPUC made no effort to find a way to make it work. No solar facilities were ever built through Prop B, although Vote Solar's web site blatantly and falsely claims otherwise. (See http://www.votesolar.org/city-initiatives/successes.html ) David Hochschild is the architect of the Mayor's privatized solar proposals. Vote Solar has been one of the most vocal proponents of the Mayor's proposals. Though Hochschild is no longer with Vote Solar, he spoke and hobnobbed at the Equinox fundraiser. As did Phil Ting (who helped Hochschild create and sponsor the Mayor's solar program and who received an award at the event for that involvement). Also present was Mayor Newsom himself, Assemblymember Mark Leno (who has frequently sponsored milquetoast renewable energy legislation which has basically amounted to faux stuff that allows PG&E to remain dominant in our Northwest power market) and, Adam Werbach, the new greenwash champion for Walmart and Wall Street.. David Hochschild -is- however VP for External Relations for Solaria Corp., a private solar technologies company which is one of those proud new Equinox funders of Vote Solar. I didn't even notice the note on Hochschild's corporate position when I saw the press release for his appointment to the SFPUC last year, but now that I've picked up on it I'm pretty shocked. Someone with that kind of energy corporation conflict of interest should not have even made it onto the SFPUC commission in the first place, and should certainly at the very least be recusing himself on all votes related to solar power funding. This all puts into even starker contrast the fact that, although Hochschild has vociferously upbraided the SFPUC staff for not creating solar and other renewables programs in San Francisco, he has never once in those tirades mentioned the Community Choice renewable energy project, which would have already been out for bids long ago were it not for both constant interference from the SFPUC staff, and a resolute and total lack of support from the SFPUC commissioners themselves (including former commissioner Adam Werbach). It has become clear that Hochschild and is his ilk are nothing more than the next generation of private corporate developers manipulating their way into sweetheart deals for their own companies at the expense of the public good, while steering city government away from publicly owned energy projects, into cozy and corrupt 'public/private partnerships'. I would have thought that the visionary renewable energy industry could have avoided this typical, tawdry trough feeding. I guess I was wrong. peace Eric -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara

1 0

[Sustain] Very Important Audio Program On Soil Sustainability
by Eric Brooks 20 Apr '08

20 Apr '08

Hi all, I highly recommend listening to an edition of KPFA's 'Against The Grain' in which a studier of economics, social structure, and the ecology of soil systems, lays out an excellent basic holistic summary of soil dynamics as the crucial interface between the atmosphere, hydrosphere, planetary crust, living systems and human social systems. You can stream or download the program at: http://www.kpfa.org/archives/index.php?arch=25717 -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara

1 0

[Sustain] Critical McKinney Report: Mexico Democratic Uprising
by Eric Brooks 20 Apr '08

20 Apr '08

http://www.fogcityjournal.com/wordpress/2008/04/19/cynthia-mckinney-on-her-… *By Cynthia McKinney* /Earth Day Celebration, April 15, California State University, Northridge./ April 19, 2008 I would like to thank the students at Cal State University, Northridge for inviting me to speak on campus today. I have just returned from an exciting trip to Mexico City and I'd like to share some of my observations with you this afternoon. First of all, it is important to note and ask the question why is it that the corporate press are not even touching the events playing out right now in the capital city of our neighbor to the south and their importance to us? Had I not actually been there myself, I would be hard pressed to convince any audience that events of this magnitude were actually taking place anywhere in the world, let alone in a country as important and close to us as Mexico. A quick review of today's press shows us that we are currently being titillated by news of sex tapes featuring Marilyn Monroe and another such tape featuring an unnamed British Royal. The top of the news hour greets us with information of an intemperate statement made by a former television executive about a current Presidential candidate; video is plentiful of the contorted Presidential theatrics around the Olympic Games Opening Ceremony in Beijing. We were treated today to the visual of the Pope descending from the Alitalia jet. But, while we have more television stations that feed us 24-hour news, we are less informed. We have more and more political pundits feeding us, what Fred Hampton described as "explanations that don't explain, answers that don't answer, and conclusions that don't conclude." CNN even tells us in a feature story who suffers as a result of a choice made by our policy makers to emphasize ethanol as a preferred method of weaning a hulking, overfed economy off its petroleum-based consumption habit. But they forgot the other half of that equation: who's winning? And it's the "who's winning" part that is just about always the key piece of information, that could guide us, especially when the choices of our elected leadership diverge from the core values of the voters who elected them. And yet, as we speak, the Mexican Senate Chamber has been occupied. The massive rally held today has probably just ended, and some of the opposition Members of the Mexican Congress are inside the building on the dais and have announced a hunger strike. Days ago, one of the leading papers in Mexico City had a photo of the Chamber of Deputies of the Mexican Congress with an unfurled banner covering the Speaker's Rostrum, proclaiming the Chamber "Closed." The banner was hung by elected Members of the Mexican Congress who constitute the Frente Amplio Progresista that has dared to draw a line in the sand against U.S.-inspired legislation just introduced to allow foreign corporate ownership of PEMEX, Mexico's state-owned oil company. Mexican women are energized around the idea of nation. The idea of patria. I wrote my Master's Thesis on the "Idea of Nation." And to see the women, in their t-shirts and kerchiefs, so committed to their country, their nation, their identity. To them, that's Mexico's oil, natural gas, electricity, land, and water and it ought to be used by the Mexican people first and foremost for their own national development. But sadly, it's the public policy emanating from Washington, D.C. that threatens that. But to tell that story accurately, would also require that the U.S. corporate press expose why this citizen outrage exists in the first place. And to tell that story, they would have to expose the fact of a stolen Presidential election, where a private U.S., Georgia, corporation, possibly played a role in stripping citizens of their right to vote and have their votes counted. Well, while that might sound like what happened in the United States, centering in Florida, in the U.S. 2000 Presidential election, I'm really talking about the 2006 Mexican Presidential election in which the popular candidate didn't win because all the votes weren't counted. According to Greg Palast, the U.S. corporation involved in the Mexican move was none other than that now infamous Georgia-based company: Choicepoint. We know that in Florida, Choicepoint, then doing business as DataBase Technologies, constructed an illegal convicted felons list of some 94,000 names, many of whom were neither convicted nor felons. But if your name appeared on that list, you were stopped from voting. Greg Palast tells us that for most of the names on that list, their only crime was "Voting While Black." Under a special "counter-terrorism" contract, the U.S. FBI obtained Mexican and Venezuelan voter files. Palast learned later in his investigation that the U.S. government had obtained, through Choicepont, voter files of all the countries that have progressive Presidents. Many Mexicans went to the polls to vote for their President, only to find that their names had been scrubbed from the voter list, and they were not allowed to vote. So now, not only in the United States, but in Mexico, too, one can show up to vote and not be sure that that vote was counted, or worse, one can show up duly registered to vote, and not even be allowed to vote. I guess this is the way we allow our country to now export democracy. Unlike in the United States in 2000, Mexico City was shut down for 5 months when Lopez Obrador, Mexico's Al Gore, refused to concede and instead, formed a shadow government. The issue in the 2006 Mexican election was privatization of Mexico's oil; it is the riveting issue taking place in Mexican politics today. Teachers on strike at the same time as the Presidential elections in Oaxaca, one of the poorest states in Mexico, began their political movement as a call for increased teacher salaries and against privatization of schools. Due to heavy-handed tactics used by the government against the teachers, tens of thousands of citizens joined them and took over the central city area of that state. Today, after Mexico has added teachers and those who support teachers to its growing ranks of "political prisoners," teachers are still protesting their conditions, the reprisals taken against them for striking, and now, the teachers' union is a committed part of the national mobilization against privatization of PEMEX. I was invited to participate in the Second Continental Workers Conference. The first meeting was held in La Paz, Bolivia. And so, people from all over Mexico and eight different countries told of their struggles, their hopes, their ideals, their values, their patriotism, their desire for peace-no more war. Representatives from Chiapas, another one of Mexico's poorest states, told us of the indigenous struggle for land and self-determination, the low-intensity warfare waged against them, and how now they, too, count themselves a part of the national mobilization against PEMEX privatization. While I was there, mine workers had taken over the mines, and so, could only send a handful of inspiring representatives. They are pressing for the right to unionize, denied to them by the Government. And the mine workers are a part of the solid front forming in Mexico to protect this powerful idea of nation. I participated in one of the many rallies organized by opponents of the government's plan to offer up Mexico's patrimony to the insatiable multiple U.S. addictions. One woman removed her brigadista t-shirt and gave it to me-proud that a citizen of the United States came to stand with them. Today's front page of La Jornada says that the women, who marched 10,000 strong on the day that I was there, have renewed their protests and civil disobedience. The threat of violence and bloodshed is very real. Now, why should this massive social, political, and economic upheaval in Mexico, aside from its human rights implications, be important to us up here in the United States? Because the sad truth of the matter is that, in many respects, it is our military and economic policies that are causing it. Of course, I recognize that all the way back to the practice of Manifest Destiny and the declaration of the Monroe Doctrine, U.S. policy decisions have at times sent shock waves to places outside our borders. You could say that the modern version of that is NAFTA. In 1993, the Democratic majority in the United States Congress supported then-President Bill Clinton's push for passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement. The stated purpose of the legislation was to remove barriers to trade and investment that existed in North America. The propaganda had it that the objective was to lift all boats, in Canada, the United States, and Mexico through trade and investment. The result is the stripping away and transfer of Mexico's patrimony in terms of their natural and human resources. And the Mexican people are taking a stand against it. They are taking the same stand that the little people in Haiti, Venezuela, Brazil, Chile, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, and Argentina have taken. With the power of the vote, the people of these countries dared to believe that they could peacefully defeat the colossus to the north. And they did. And so, in a way, now, I guess I understand why the corporate press can't tell you and me the truth about the valiant stand for dignity that's going on in Mexico, because to truly cover the story, they'd have to uncover and point out some inconvenient truths. One of those inconvenient truths particularly meaningful to me: There comes a time when silence is betrayal. We, the little--and yet so powerful--people in this country have been way too silent for way too long on all the issues that mean so much. Dr. King also said that our lives begin to end the day we become silent about the things that matter. On one of my early days in Congress, I was late for a vote. I looked up on the board and only saw green votes; I presumed that the vote was a non-controversial item on the calendar. Since I was among the last to vote, there was no time to inquire. I pressed my green button. Afterwards, I learned that the vote might have been what others would have called an "easy" yes vote, but for my conscience it was a no vote. Later that night, my heart sank as I watched the news. One man of 78 years was so angered by that vote that he threw stones. Only thing, he had a heart attack throwing stones, and died. My heart sank. I felt personally responsible for that man's death and vowed that I would never cast what they call easy votes, again. My one vote would not have changed the outcome of the tally on the resolution. But my one vote would have been true to my values and my ideals that everyone is entitled to human rights that are to be respected. I got into trouble often after that, because I recognized my responsibility to read the legislation, think analytically, question critically, and vote independently. That was while I was in Congress. But now that I'm not, does that mean that the responsibility is gone? No. I happened to vote against NAFTA, and I'm glad for that. But imagine if the all the voters in the entire United States understood that something as simple as a vote in a federal election might determine who lives and who dies in another country. Imagine, if we in the United States were as certain of the possibility of peaceful change through the vote as were the people of Haiti, Mexico-despite having their election stolen from them, Venezuela, and the rest. Then we would vote Members of Congress out of office who support Plan Colombia. We would vote Members of Congress out of office who support Plan Mexico-which like its Colombian counterpart, is the military answer to the cry of the people for dignity, self determination, and that idea of patria. We would not vote for any political party that did not have as its agenda extending the same respect and love of life to all others as we reserve for ourselves. And so I come to the additional meaning of Earth Day, today. I met people in Mexico City who are willing to die in this struggle-But they shouldn't have to because the United States wants their oil. Let us express our respect for the planet that sustains us by first showing love to our brothers and sisters beside us. We voters in the United States do have as much power as the voters in all those other countries. All we have to do is believe in ourselves and use it. Finally, I'd like to recognize the role of student activists in promoting change. Of course, it was high school students who faced the water hoses and the dogs in the civil rights movement. It was the university students who faced the riot gear and the bullets in the anti war movement. The current anti-globalization, pro-peace rallies are all organized and led by young people. Keep it up and don't ever give in. ### -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." -- Che Guevara

1 0

[Sustain] Joint Meeting: Transportation & Sustainability Working Groups, Thu, Apr 24, 6:30-9pm, SFGP Office
by Eric Brooks 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Joint Meeting: Transportation & Sustainability Working Groups When: Thursday, 4/24/08, 6:30PM-9:00PM Where: SFGP Office, 1028A Howard St NOTE: This will be a very important meeting because the final committee hearing on the polluting Combustion Turbine power plant proposal for the Bayview Hunters Point will be held at City Hall within 2 weeks, and we need to organize to attend that hearing in big numbers to demand a halt to the power plant project. Proposed Agenda Items - Assessing The Transit Effectiveness Project - McGoldrick's Elected MTA Charter Amendment - Peak Oil Taskforce Update - Critical Combustion Turbine Update - Update On Mayor's Solar Programs and New Sandoval Solar Proposal - Update On Community Choice Energy project

1 0