October 2007 - Transpo - list.sfgreens.org

Further ALERT! SFPUC This Wed Oct 31 To ALSO Hear JPower CT Plant Contract (without Commissioner Sklar!)
by Eric Brooks 27 Oct '07

27 Oct '07

Hi all, I just found out that the SFPUC is ALSO having a surprise hearing this Wednesday to hear and possibly approve the JPower contract to build the CT plant. Commissioner Richard Sklar, who has been our most active supporter in fighting the plant, will be out of town. Those of you who have not yet spoken at the SFPUC and those of us in leadership of the various campaigns fighting the plant should also attend that hearing to restate our opposition and to demand that the Commissioners make -no- decisions until Sklar returns. Here are the details for that meeting: *AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING * Wednesday, October 31, 2007 *2:30 P.M. NOTE DIFFERENT DAY/START TIME* City Hall, Room 400 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place *ORDER OF BUSINESS* 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call *CLOSED SESSION* 3. Public comments on matters to be discussed in Closed Session. 4. Motion on whether to assert the attorney-client privilege regarding the matters listed below as Conference with Legal Counsel. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION WILL GO INTO CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 5. Conference with Real Property Negotiator -- Pursuant to Sunshine Ordinance Section 67.8 (a)(2), Govt. Code section 54956.8: Property: located at 25th Street and Maryland in San Francisco, California. (Hale) Negotiator for the SFPUC: Barbara Hale Negotiator: JPower. 6. Conference with Legal Counsel -- Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) and (c) and San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.10 (d) (2) Anticipated Litigation: As defendant. (Ambrose) FOLLOWING THE CLOSED SESSION, THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION WILL RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. 7. Announcement following Closed Session. 8. Motion regarding whether to disclose the discussions during Closed Session. 9. Staff presentation, discussion and action related to matters addressed in the SFPUC Resolution No 07-0137, including the proposed San Francisco Electric Reliability Project (the Combustion Turbines (CTs) and related facilities), the JPower agreements and leases, and any related agreements, authorizations and permits required from other City Departments or federal, state or local agencies pertaining to this Project, and adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. (Leal, Irons, Hale). ADJOURNMENT of the Special Meeting

1 0

Peskin's Attempt To Gut SF Dept. of Env. After It Opposed Polluting Power Plant
by Eric Brooks 27 Oct '07

27 Oct '07

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/25/BA80SVJKJ.DTL&h… SAN FRANCISCO Peskin thwarted in attempt to gut Environment Dept. City Charter only allows voters to decide fate of the agency Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Staff Writer San Francisco Board of Supervisors President Aaron *Peskin* quietly introduced a piece of legislation at City Hall this week to eviscerate an entire city department, just days after the head of that department broke with *Peskin* and other city leaders on a major energy policy. The legislation would eliminate the jobs of all 64 employees of the San Francisco Department of the Environment - except for its director, Jared Blumenfeld - but was deemed illegal by the city attorney's office on Wednesday. "This is not the first skirmish the board has had with the Department of the Environment and it probably won't be the last," *Peskin* said after receiving word from the city attorney that gutting an entire arm of government whose existence is written into the City Charter just wouldn't fly. The charter can only be changed at the ballot box by voters. Blumenfeld said he was "horrified" when he first learned of the proposal Wednesday morning, the day after *Peskin* submitted the one line of legislation without fanfare to the clerk of the Board of Supervisors. "The Department of the Environment is recognized time and time again as the premier local environmental organization in the country," said Blumenfeld, noting his agency's efforts when the city hosted the U.N. World Environment Day in 2005. "I was really disturbed that someone, without even phoning me, would decide to cut all these great staff people we have in the department," he added. The department, formed after city residents voted to add it to the charter in 1996, has a budget that has grown steadily over time to just over $15 million this year. It gets almost no money from the general fund and instead is financed through grants and projects. The legislation to effectively dissolve the department followed a meeting in the mayor's office Friday at which Blumenfeld broke with the plans of the city Public Utilities Commission - which are supported by Mayor Gavin Newsom, *Peskin* and other supervisors - to build a new natural gas-burning power plant near Potrero Hill. The plant would replace an older, more polluting plant in the area. It would consist of three "peakers," which means officials would only turn them on when demand for power was high. But according to people who attended the meeting, Blumenfeld said he thought the city should oppose a fossil-fuel power plant and come up with other alternatives, which put a significant voice in opposition to the perception of a unified city front on the issue. Blumenfeld said *Peskin*'s proposal, which was co-sponsored by Supervisors Gerardo Sandoval and Sophie Maxwell, "is clearly a shot across the bow to say, 'You know what? Discourse in San Francisco shouldn't have too much environmental content to it when it doesn't support the status quo.' " *Peskin* would not address the power plant issue other than to saying Blumenfeld's stance on the peaker is "rather nuanced." He said his legislation is a nonissue because the city attorney must approve any legislation for it to be considered by the board. "It's much ado about nothing. I have no intention of moving the legislation and let's let bygones be bygones," *Peskin* said. But several supervisors have deep concerns about the department, *Peskin* added, referring in part to questions about whether the growth of the Department of the Environment over the years has been warranted and whether its work is duplicative of efforts that could be carried elsewhere in city government. Sandoval said he would like to find a way to move the proposal forward and make big changes in the department. He contended that Blumenfeld ignores the board's suggestions for the department, such as one Sandoval said he made that some administrators in the department should be able to speak Spanish or Chinese. "The Department of the Environment does a pretty good job for the mayor but is largely unresponsive to priorities that come from the Board of Supervisors and our constituents," Sandoval said. Supervisor Sean Elsbernd said he was intrigued by *Peskin*'s legislation and said he thinks the department has too much overlap with other city departments in the services it provides. Maxwell noted that while the department does not draw money from the city's general fund for basic government services, it does receive grants that could be spent elsewhere. "Yes, they do some good work, but it's time to take a closer look," Maxwell said. That's not a universally held sentiment at City Hall or in the community, however. Janet Nudelman, an administrator with the Breast Cancer Fund, said the department has been instrumental in working with the organization to examine the role of the environment and toxins in disease. "The department is not only effective in what it is able to accomplish, but it is truly the most visionary city agency," Nudelman said. Newsom's spokesman, Nathan Ballard, said the mayor didn't support *Peskin*'s move. Ballard said he did not understand "why anyone would declare war on the Department of Environment." Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier, a Newsom ally on the board, lauded the department for assisting her legislation to ban phthalates, which soften plastic and have been shown to be toxic, from children's products and called the legislation to cut the department "outrageous." Alioto-Pier accused *Peskin* of using his legislative power to punish others who don't go along with him, saying she had her own run-in with the board president this week and wound up paying a political price when *Peskin* switched his vote to kill a charter amendment Alioto-Pier was pushing for the February ballot. Alioto-Pier said she asked *Peskin* about the move in a meeting in his office. She said he replied by telling her, "Payback is a bitch." She said *Peskin* said he was punishing Alioto-Pier for giving a television interview opposing Proposition A, the Muni reform measure he sponsored on November's ballot. Asked about the conversation, *Peskin* said he wouldn't discuss it, saying he doesn't divulge details of private conversations he has with other supervisors. But he added that Alioto-Pier's comments on the conversation "sound to me to be unfortunate and vindictive." /E-mail Wyatt Buchanan at wbuchanan(a)sfchronicle.com <mailto:wbuchanan@sfchronicle.com>./ This article appeared on page *B - 3* of the San Francisco Chronicle -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." -- Che Guevara

1 0

URGENT-EMERGENCY!: This MONDAY Polluting Fossil Fuel Plant Approval In Land Use Committee!!
by Eric Brooks 27 Oct '07

27 Oct '07

MORE THAN URGENT! Sophie Maxwell and Aaron Peskin, at the last possible minute on -Friday- scheduled a hearing in the Land Use Committee this MONDAY on Sophie's resolution to support a polluting natural gas Combustion Turbine (CT) plant to be built in San Francisco in the Bayview Hunters Point. Having your voice at this hearing is vital! The recently approved Community Choice renewable energy project and Transbay Cable project together will bring San Francisco enough electricity capacity to meet its peak load energy requirements. This makes building yet another fossil fuel plant in San Francisco (especially in our most polluted neighborhood) completely insane! The resolution has very strong, bad, wording that will make the fight to stop this plant -much- harder. **We -must- generate the biggest turnout possible on Monday. The hearing is at 1pm and the item is first on the agenda so it shouldn't take that long to get to public comment.** Here are the meeting time/place details: WHEN: Monday October 29, 1pm WHERE: City Hall, Room 263 (The same room where they held the special SFPUC hearing we spoke at.) Turn out the troops and email everyone you know! We recently kicked their butts in a similar hearing at the SFPUC, now let's do so at the Board of Supervisors! To read the resolution go to http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/committees/materials/07105… If you have questions call me at my phone number below. peace Eric Brooks Campaign Coordinator Our City 415-756-8844 http://our-city.org

1 0

Meeting Tonight?
by Eric Brooks 24 Oct '07

24 Oct '07

Hi John-Marc and all. Is there a Transportation WG meeting tonight? I'm thinking maybe we should keep the Transpo and Sustainability working groups separate in the sense of platforms, official actions, and email lists/decisions, but start having each actual meeting as a joint Transpo/Sustainability meeting so we can get a critical mass of people for both. We could start an hour earlier to make sure we have time to cover more issues. Thoughts? Eric -- "I am not a liberator. Liberators do not exist. The people liberate themselves." – Che Guevara

2 1

Our City: Voter Guide, Solar/Wind Powered SF, Stop Fossil Fuel Plant & Pollution In Bayview
by Eric Brooks 23 Oct '07

23 Oct '07

*Our City Update Voter Guide 2007, Solar & Wind Power, Stopping Fossil Fuel Plants & Toxic Waste In SF* * 1 - Voter Guide For November: Critical Votes On Transit & Parking 2 - 50% Solar & Wind Power For San Francisco! 3 - Stopping Another Fossil Fuel Plant In San Francisco 4 - CORE REPORT: Bayview Under Siege - The Toxic Corporate Attack On Our Most Polluted Neighborhood 5 - The Past Year's Election Victories * NOTE: This Update and Voter Guide can be directly accessed online. (Mozilla/Netscape users view PDF version.) - See the Update (PDF version) at http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.pdf or the web version at http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.htm - See the printable half page Voter Guide (PDF) at http://our-city.org/Voteguide-Nov07.pdf or the web version at http://our-city.org/Voteguide-Nov07.htm (If you have trouble with these or any of the links below, go to the Our City home page at http://our-city.org and follow the links on the lefthand side entitled *Voter Guide*, and (under Updates) *Fall 2007: Stopping Fossil Fuel Plants & Toxic Waste In SF*.) *Top Stories **1 - Voter Guide For November: Critical Votes On Transit & Parking* This November, two critical local measures on Mass Transit and Parking are on the Ballot. Proposition H is an extremely bad, pro-automobile measure (sponsored by corporate conservatives) which will vastly increase parking, gridlock, pollution and greenhouse gases in San Francisco. Proposition A is a grassroots initiative that will increase funding for cleaner mass transit, and will strike down Prop H if it passes. *Vote NO on H! and YES on A!** *See our entire 2007 Voter Guide at (PDF) http://our-city.org/Voteguide-Nov07.pdf or (web) http://our-city.org/Voteguide-Nov07.htm *2 - 50% Solar & Wind Power For San Francisco! *In June 2007, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed the Community Choice renewable energy project, which will run San Francisco on 50% solar and wind power within the next decade, and will end San Francisco's century long dependence on PG&E's polluting corporate energy monopoly. See the full report at (PDF) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.pdf or (web) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.htm *3 - Stopping Another Fossil Fuel Plant In San Francisco *Even though San Francisco is about to build the largest municipal solar and wind power project on Earth, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) still has plans to allow a private corporation to build another polluting natural gas power plant inside the City! And to make matters worse, the SFPUC plans to let this plant be built in the Bayview Hunters Point, which is already San Francisco's most polluted neighborhood. The SFPUC will vote as early as this week on whether or not to approve the project. Read more about this unacceptable power plant on page 2 of the Update, (PDF) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.pdf or (web) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07_files/page0001.htm Get more detail and *Take Action* to stop the plant at http://our-city.org/campaigns/index.html *4 - CORE REPORT: Bayview Under Siege - The Toxic Corporate Attack On Our Most Polluted Neighborhood *For decades, the Bayview Hunters Point neighborhood has suffered terrible toxic pollution because the U.S. Navy, various corporations, and the City itself, have been allowed to emit pollutants (including deadly asbestos) and to dump other toxic and even radioactive wastes in this community; a community which is, in vast majority, people of color and low income. Now the City and its Health department is continuing the toxic assault by allowing Miami based Lennar corporation to further devastate the Bayview and illegally stir those hazardous chemicals back up into the atmosphere, as it builds gentrifying market rate and luxury condos for profit. We, the people of San Francisco, must halt this outrage immediately. Read the full expose on page 3 of the Update at (PDF) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.pdf or (web) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07_files/page0002.htm *5 - The Past Year's Election Victories *Over the past year, progressives have won crucial tenant protections, paid sick days for workers, and mandatory public hearings on chain stores; have stopped dangerous ballot attacks on the environment and reproductive choice; and have won critical victories for progressive education board candidates and Board Supervisors. See our full report on ballot measure victories on page 1 of the Update, (PDF) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.pdf or (web) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.htm See our report on the now majority progressive School Board, and other candidate victories, on page 2 of the Update at (PDF) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07.pdf or (web) http://our-city.org/Update-Oct07_files/page0001.htm As always, thank you for your continued involvement and action. peace Eric Brooks Campaign Coordinator Our City //This update posted by: Our City 1028-A Howard St. San Francisco, CA 94103 415-756-8844 For more information about Our City campaigns go to: http://www.our-city.org info(a)our-city.org <mailto:info@our-city.org> //

2 1

Upcoming volunteer opportunities
by susan_e_vaughan＠juno.com 22 Oct '07

22 Oct '07

Hello Everyone, Here is the list of upcoming SFGP volunteer opportunities: 1) Wednesday, October 24, 6 p.m. to 9p.m. -- phone banking at the SFGP office to raise money to send our election newspaper to the rest of the registered Greens. We will get take-out Vietnamese food from Tu Lan midway through the evening. Please call Micheas for more details: 424-5881; 2) Saturday, October 27, 11 a.m. -- Anti-War March and Rally. The march starts at the Civic Center and ends at Dolores Park. Members of the Westside Greens will be gathering at the Civic Center for the march -- look for the SFGP banner. Micheas and Sue will be tabling at the other end at Dolores Park. Call Sue for details: (415) 601-9297; 3) SFGP newspaper distribution -- ongoing. When you are the office, make sure to take a stack of newspapers and distribute them at transit stops and elsewhere. 4) Tuesday, October 30, 6 to 8 p.m. -- Halloween Happy Hour with Green School Board Commissioner Jane Kim at 111 Minna. You can volunteer to have a good time at this particular event! 5) Saturday, November 10 and Sunday, November 11 -- SF Green Festival at the Concourse Building at 8th and Brannan. We will be out tabling in front of the entrance. Call Sue at (415) 601-9297 if you are interested in helping. Peace Sue

1 0

Fwd: Big Oil Pushing Dems to Vote for Anti-Environment NAFTA Expansion
by Eric Brooks 16 Oct '07

16 Oct '07

/does this e-mail look wrong, or can you not read it at all? *click here* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=41LkIPRDenaSNdNjzmm0…>/ <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ZHXDo5gzBgwW%2BYHijF…> *Action Alert --- October 16, 2007* *How _NOT_ to solve global warming: NAFTA for the Amazon!* *Take action to save the Amazon!* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Fzh4tO8IjgvOYDIisDbJ…> Democratic leadership has promised to bring Big Oil's dream trade deal - the Peru NAFTA expansion - up for a vote by the end of October. We've got to stop them. <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Ow5E3L0jsbs9%2FDrmxV…> Dear Supporter, When Big Oil companies are going full steam on a stealth lobbying mission for more access to the Amazon, it doesn't take a geological engineering degree to realize that whatever they are pushing is probably bad for the environment. So, it's more than a little disturbing that Democrats in Congress are scheduling a vote on one of Big Oil's top legislative priorities - an expansion of NAFTA to the South American country of Peru that would give them powerful new rights to ravage the endangered Amazon rainforest. Indigenous leaders from the Peruvian Amazon are in Washington, DC right now urging the U.S. Congress to save their Amazon rainforest home and help stop global warming by defeating the Bush administration's proposed NAFTA expansion.[1] But they need our help! *Please urge your representatives in Congress to save the Amazon from Big Oil's Peru NAFTA scheme - and vote NO on HR 3688, the Peru "free trade" agreement (Peru FTA).* Take action here: *http://action.citizen.org/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=17124* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=o7HLLqUSlq26vShL6Tu8…> Bush's NAFTA expansion to Peru, which would extend NAFTA's most environment-ravaging provisions to cover the upper Amazon basin, is at the top of the agenda for multinational oil companies like Chevron-Texaco, a co-chair of the U.S.-Peru Trade Coalition.[2] The Peru deal includes new rights for Big Oil that extend even beyond NAFTA's awful provisions. The proposed pact would empower multinational oil and gas to drag Peru's government to World Bank tribunals to demand compensation for changes to the corporations' exploration and exploitation contracts that could undermine their "expected future profits." What this means is that the Peru FTA would allow these firms to crush measures Peru's government might take to protect the Amazon rainforest. Big Oil is well aware of this hidden provision in the Peru FTA. In fact, they call it a "significant improvement" over other trade deals in an official report for Bush's energy industry corporate advisory committee on trade.[3] *Locking in Oil Company Leases:* When negotiations on the trade deal started back in 2004, only 13 percent of Peru's Amazon was zoned for oil and gas exploration and exploitation. The last two governments have now opened over 65 percent of the region, including national parks and other ostensibly protected areas. The FTA's new foreign investor protections would help lock in this outrage, even if a new pro-environment government were elected in Peru - granting Big Oil the world's most important rainforest as its private Monopoly board game. Multinational oil companies involved in Peru include *Occidental* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=3g3XZfGCVo1ai7C79Wqa…> and *ConocoPhillips* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=55lAW%2FeEx1C6vShL6T…>, whose political action committees have been layering the campaign donations on to the same members of the U.S. Congress who will be voting on the deal. Click the image for a larger version: <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=FdSW8yhtHRu6vShL6Tu8…> In a *recent letter* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=G%2B5TYT8NhtcmUeO%2F…> to the U.S. Congress, environmental groups that work on protecting the Amazon rainforest wrote: /Given the challenges that the world faces to stem global warming, we simply cannot afford to advance trade agreements that we are certain will result in the deforestation of critical tropical rainforests./ In short, Big Oil's Peru NAFTA push will help heat up the planet and reduce our energy independence. The Peru FTA is slated for a vote before the end of October, so we need to move fast. Please act now to make sure your Representative and both of your Senators know where you stand! Take action here: *http://action.citizen.org/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=17124* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=5iS5byzSYzCFCDbeeVK4…> And please, please send this email to all of your friends. If we want to make progress on climate change, we can't let the new Congress cave in to Big Oil by passing trade agreements that help lock in the very policies we know must be changed. Thank you for all that you do, David Edeli Global Trade Watch Division Public Citizen [1] "Los pueblos indigenas no quieren el TLC," <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ITsQ3k1kKdKSNdNjzmm0…> /La Republica/, October 11, 2007, /Seccion Economia/, p.14. [2] See the Latin America Trade Coalition website <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=3tPhUdRc2%2B4W%2BYHi…>. [3] "The U.S. - Peru Free Trade Agreement (FTA)," <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=qpVLPdo9gI7OYDIisDbJ…> Report of the Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Energy and Energy Services (ITAC 6), January 2006. (PDF) *About GTW* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=4d7F2fe0jw49%2FDrmxV…> | *Contact Us* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=cxKMYj2pAfcHFsi3g%2F…> | *Write Your Rep* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=w1w4hTdD7V9ai7C79Wqa…> | *Support Us* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=SsZSCrJeYeVI8EonFgan…> Stay informed and speak out when it counts. *Sign up for the Public Citizen Action Network* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=nQwfN5aKM5AL4%2FLHOy…> or other online announcements. If you do not wish to receive e-mail messages from Public Citizen in the future, please *click here* <http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=CfRn2h8NdxcmUeO%2Fhz…>. Public Citizen employees are members of SEIU Local 500. We support the rights of workers in the United States and around the world to organize freely. Union Yes! Copyright © 2007 Public Citizen. All Rights Reserved 215 Pennsylvania Ave. SE, 3rd Floor Washington, DC 20003

1 0

URGENT call for phone bankers: Monday, Oct. 15, 7 to 9; Wed., Oct. 17, 7 to 9; bring cell phones
by susan_e_vaughan＠juno.com 13 Oct '07

13 Oct '07

Hello Everyone, This election cycle is REALLY important. His Republican Holiness Donald Fisher, in collusion with the construction company Webcor, has put a measure on the ballot that would turn San Francisco into a pollution and traffic nightmare -- Proposition H. In a last minute deal with Board President Aaron Peskin, supporters of H (the usuals: Committee on Jobs and the Republican Party and so on) agreed to refrain from campaigning in support of H in return for a "February Compromise." Don't ask. The Greens would have opposed the compromise. WOULD HAVE. Lord Fisher has reneged on the deal and has sent out a mailer to get H passed. We found this out today. This year the active Greens have managed to print a Green Party Election Newspaper. We have never been able to do this before. This newspaper has a long, readable explanation of our opposition to Proposition H. We have been able to print it and pay for the first mailing to absentee voter Greens. WE NEED TO RAISE THE MONEY TO SEND THE NEWSPAPER TO THE REST OF THE REGISTERED GREENS. WE NEED YOUR HELP PHONE BANKING REGISTERED GREENS TO RAISE THAT MONEY. WE ARE PHONE BANKING ON MONDAY, OCT. 15 FROM 7 TO 9 P.M., AND WED., OCT. 17. FROM 7 TO 9 P.M. 9 (we will hold a shortened General Membersip meeting starting at 9 p.m.). PLEASE BRING YOUR CELL PHONES AND COME JOIN US FOR A NIGHT OF PHONE BANKING AND FOOD. WHERE: 1028A HOWARD STREET, BETWEEN SIXTH AND SEVENTH, CLOSER TO 6TH Sue Vaughan (415) 668-3119 or (415) 601-9297

1 0

check out this thing I found on Gavin's webage ...
by susan_e_vaughan＠juno.com 12 Oct '07

12 Oct '07

THis blog on Gavin's reelection webpage claims that hydrocarbons are renewable. Sue http://actlocallysf.org/blog/agreen/2007/03/18/hydrocarbons-are-renewable-r…

2 1

Feb Ballot Compromise Off?! No On A/Yes On H Mailer Received
by Eric Brooks 12 Oct '07

12 Oct '07

Jason Henderson, active in non-car circles, has received a No on A/Yes on H mailer from Donald Fisher. It came in the mail the same day that he received his absentee ballot. ANyone know if Mark Sanchez has agreed to do a No on H fundraiser yet? Sue _______________________________________________ San Francisco Green Party Active Members List To unsubscribe or edit your options, go here: https://list.sfgreens.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/active

1 0